Re: Time Machines, FTL, and P=NP

On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:44:40 -0500, James Burns <burns.87@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

:But then, without the wackiness to force consistency in highly
:unlikely ways, it looks to me not too hard to set up a situation
:where /no/ possible outcome is consistent. For my simple example,
:just put the received signal through a NOT gate before sending
:it back in time. What happens in that case? Hard reboot on the
:universe?

	Mechanical failure of the time machine, or some 
other break in the chain.
-- 
/buddha@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 W. Harris  For actual email address, replace each 'u' with an 'i'