Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Science > Re: Slow Stealt...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 13 of 65 Topic 3375 of 3499
Post > Topic >>

Re: Slow Stealth

by "dwight.thieme@[EMAIL PROTECTED] " <dwight.thieme@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 23, 2008 at 02:59 PM

On Feb 23, 3:42 pm, Luke Campbell <lwc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Feb 23, 5:21 am, Jack Tingle <wjtin...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > Mass drivers probably have the lowest radiated signature of any
> > propulsion system.
>
> Nah, because you need to power the mass driver with something else.
> Fission?  You have a waste heat of about twice your usable electric
> work that you can pump into the mass driver (maybe only about equal
> to, but slightly greater than, your electric work if you use an
> advanced helium cooled high temperature fast reactor).  In this case a
> nuke-thermal drive is actually stealthier than a mass driver, because
> the nuke thermal exhaust comes out hot, and the exhaust cools the
> reactor so you don't need radiators.  Hot means a higher peak black
> body spectrum, which means fewer photons radiated per unit energy
> produced.  Fewer photons means a lower signal to noise ratio.  You are
> also able to turn maybe 80% to 90% of the thermal power into useful
> work, so only 10% to 20% of the total thermal power is radiated away
> (mostly in the drive plume which, as I mentioned, is hot).
>
> Now the bit about keeping the radiators edge on to your observer is
> clever, but as others have noted it is not particularly effective
> assuming a civilization with an extensive presence in space.  And if
> they don't have an extensive presence in space while you are capable
> of moving asteroids, you probably out-class them so badly that there
> is no need to be stealthy.
>
> Luke

I imagine this is a game where people try to keep tabs on everyone
else's sensors.  They themselves radiate, after all, more-so if they
have maneuvering capability.  If not, keep track of the ships that
might place them in strategic orbits.  Also, no matter how far-flung
your net is, it can easily be foiled by maneuvering outside the convex
hull formed by the individual units.

Of course, coff, in real-life, the notion of any sort of manned space
war seems very unlikely.  War-craft might very well be at ambient
temperature and use something like a mag-sail for propulsion.  Pretty
hard to detect one of those, at least in comparison with anything else
discussed so far.




 65 Posts in Topic:
Slow Stealth
Jack Tingle <wjtingle@  2008-02-23 08:21:43 
Re: Slow Stealth
SolomonW <SolomonW@[EM  2008-02-24 01:34:55 
Re: Slow Stealth
Jack Tingle <wjtingle@  2008-02-23 10:41:39 
Re: Slow Stealth
"dwight.thieme@[EMAI  2008-02-23 08:21:44 
Re: Slow Stealth
IsaacKuo <mechdan@[EMA  2008-02-23 08:29:33 
Re: Slow Stealth
Bryan Derksen <bryan.d  2008-02-23 17:45:22 
Re: Slow Stealth
Jack Tingle <wjtingle@  2008-02-23 14:23:16 
Re: Slow Stealth
John Schilling <schill  2008-02-23 12:17:49 
Re: Slow Stealth
IsaacKuo <mechdan@[EMA  2008-02-23 12:28:42 
Re: Slow Stealth
"dwight.thieme@[EMAI  2008-02-23 13:27:42 
Re: Slow Stealth
phoenix@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-04 20:10:58 
Re: Slow Stealth
Luke Campbell <lwcamp@  2008-02-23 13:42:57 
Re: Slow Stealth
"dwight.thieme@[EMAI  2008-02-23 14:59:34 
Re: Slow Stealth
IsaacKuo <mechdan@[EMA  2008-02-23 17:10:37 
Re: Slow Stealth
"dwight.thieme@[EMAI  2008-02-23 17:18:56 
Re: Slow Stealth
IsaacKuo <mechdan@[EMA  2008-02-23 17:41:01 
Re: Slow Stealth
"dwight.thieme@[EMAI  2008-02-23 17:56:11 
Re: Slow Stealth
IsaacKuo <mechdan@[EMA  2008-02-23 17:59:49 
Re: Slow Stealth
IsaacKuo <mechdan@[EMA  2008-02-23 18:17:35 
Re: Slow Stealth
"dwight.thieme@[EMAI  2008-02-23 18:42:18 
Re: Slow Stealth
IsaacKuo <mechdan@[EMA  2008-02-23 20:16:31 
Re: Slow Stealth
"dwight.thieme@[EMAI  2008-02-23 21:20:27 
Re: Slow Stealth
Tim Little <tim@[EMAIL  2008-02-24 07:11:41 
Re: Slow Stealth
IsaacKuo <mechdan@[EMA  2008-02-23 23:21:04 
Re: Slow Stealth
IsaacKuo <mechdan@[EMA  2008-02-23 23:26:35 
Re: Slow Stealth
Tim Little <tim@[EMAIL  2008-02-24 14:23:07 
Re: Slow Stealth
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-24 09:43:38 
Re: Slow Stealth
"dwight.thieme@[EMAI  2008-02-24 07:59:05 
Re: Slow Stealth
Bryan Derksen <bryan.d  2008-02-25 18:55:19 
Re: Slow Stealth
IsaacKuo <mechdan@[EMA  2008-02-24 10:01:37 
Re: Slow Stealth
CharlesRCaplan@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-25 10:27:22 
Re: Slow Stealth
Bryan Derksen <bryan.d  2008-02-25 19:01:25 
Re: Slow Stealth
CharlesRCaplan@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-25 12:14:29 
Re: Slow Stealth
CharlesRCaplan@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-25 12:22:51 
Re: Slow Stealth
IsaacKuo <mechdan@[EMA  2008-02-25 13:29:51 
Re: Slow Stealth
IsaacKuo <mechdan@[EMA  2008-02-25 13:45:43 
Re: Slow Stealth
Damien Valentine <vale  2008-02-25 14:25:54 
Re: Slow Stealth
Jack Tingle <wjtingle@  2008-02-25 18:29:54 
Re: Slow Stealth
Luke Campbell <lwcamp@  2008-02-25 14:53:41 
Re: Slow Stealth
Tim Little <tim@[EMAIL  2008-02-26 01:05:19 
Re: Slow Stealth
IsaacKuo <mechdan@[EMA  2008-02-25 15:59:16 
Re: Slow Stealth
Luke Campbell <lwcamp@  2008-02-25 20:07:00 
Re: Slow Stealth
Tim Little <tim@[EMAIL  2008-02-26 05:14:09 
Re: Slow Stealth
Luke Campbell <lwcamp@  2008-02-25 22:00:52 
Re: Slow Stealth
CharlesRCaplan@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-26 06:25:57 
Re: Slow Stealth
IsaacKuo <mechdan@[EMA  2008-02-26 06:50:56 
Re: Slow Stealth
Tim Little <tim@[EMAIL  2008-02-26 23:42:25 
Re: Slow Stealth
CharlesRCaplan@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-26 07:24:44 
Re: Slow Stealth
CharlesRCaplan@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-26 07:55:36 
Re: Slow Stealth
IsaacKuo <mechdan@[EMA  2008-02-26 08:14:01 
Re: Slow Stealth
IsaacKuo <mechdan@[EMA  2008-02-26 08:42:32 
Re: Slow Stealth
"dwight.thieme@[EMAI  2008-02-26 09:15:57 
Re: Slow Stealth
phoenix@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-04 20:55:20 
Re: Slow Stealth
Luke Campbell <lwcamp@  2008-02-26 09:38:26 
Re: Slow Stealth
CharlesRCaplan@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-26 11:02:51 
Re: Slow Stealth
IsaacKuo <mechdan@[EMA  2008-02-26 20:37:23 
Re: Slow Stealth
Tim Little <tim@[EMAIL  2008-02-27 07:20:06 
Re: Slow Stealth
CharlesRCaplan@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-28 06:57:17 
Re: Slow Stealth
IsaacKuo <mechdan@[EMA  2008-02-28 08:49:56 
Re: Slow Stealth
CharlesRCaplan@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-29 06:08:57 
Re: Slow Stealth
Tim Little <tim@[EMAIL  2008-02-29 23:56:22 
Re: Slow Stealth
Luke Campbell <lwcamp@  2008-02-29 07:36:41 
Re: Slow Stealth
CharlesRCaplan@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-29 12:36:05 
Re: Slow Stealth
Tim Little <tim@[EMAIL  2008-03-01 00:05:52 
Re: Slow Stealth
Luke Campbell <lwcamp@  2008-02-29 14:42:30 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Tue May 13 15:01:32 CDT 2008.