Re: A partial black hole?

Crown-Horned Snorkack wrote:

> Material captured along the equatorial plane naturally falls to
> singularity. But material falling along the axis cannot fall to
> singularity because of axial symmetry.
> 
>>  There is no internal structure,
> 
> There is. The circular singularity and internal horizons to begin
> with.

You're talking about a Kerr black hole.  I was talking about a 
Schwarzschild black hole.  Not that the Kerr geometry really changes 
anything, since anything falling through the ring singularity _still_ 
experiences infinite blue****fting, so is still utterly destroyed. 
You're nitpicking a point that is immaterial to the point that we are 
making, which is this:  If you fall inside the event horizon of a black 
hole, you will be rapidly and utterly destroyed.

>> it will, and very
>> rapidly so, fall inward and hit the singularity and be destroyed.
>>
> And destroy the singularity when the singularity was a point.

A black hole changing from a Schwarzschild type to a Kerr type once 
angular momentum is added doesn't "destroy the singularity," so you're 
shooting for something here that doesn't make sense.

> But suppose that you have two black holes whose event horizons do not
> intersect, but whose stationary limits do. Nothing, not even light,
> can move against the rotation of ergosphere. Which way is forward in
> time in a part of space which is in ergospheres of two black holes?

It depends on the external geometry of the two black holes, obviously -- 
how big they are, how fast they are rotating and in what direction, and 
what ****tions of their ergospheres intersect in what way.  You'll end up 
with a different compound static limit and objects within that static 
limit (but still outside each black hole's event horizon) will not be 
able to stay at constant axial angle from either black hole or both. 
I'm not sure what your point is.

-- 
Erik Max Francis && max@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 && http://www.alcyone.com/max/
  San Jose, CA, USA && 37 18 N 121 57 W && AIM, Y!M erikmaxfrancis
   Chastity the most unnatural of the ***ual perversions.
    -- Aldous Huxley