

|
 |
| Science Fiction > Science > Re: planetary a... |
|
| << Topic |
< Post |
Post 21 of 30 Topic 3382 of 3876
|
Post > |
Topic >> |
Re: planetary and atmospheric rotation - origins, direction, etc
by throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Wayne Throop)
Feb 29, 2008 at 04:25 AM
| : Tim Little <tim@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
: It has a lot to do with what the ground is doing. If Earth's
: atmosphere was decoupled from the ground, then Coriolis effects would
: be absent.
Coriolis forces have nothing do do with whether the atmosphere is
"coupled"
to the earth or not. They have only to do with whoat coordinates are
being used.
If you interpose a completely frictionless membrane along the ground,
to isolate the air from any lateral influence from the ground, it'd
still experience coriolis forces. Indeed, even if you meant that
the atmosphere was motionless in an inertial frame, and you were using
coordinates where the ground is motionless, the atmosphere would *still*
be subject to the coriolis effect; it would simply be cancelled out
by the centrifugal effect, for the most part. The coriolis force on
an object moving antispinward is equal and opposite to the centrifugal
force on an object at that distance from the center.
"Coriolis forces" have little to do with the observEE,
and much to do with the observER.
I dunno. Maybe I'm just not understanding what you mean by
"decoupling" the atmosphere.
Wayne Throop throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sheol.org/throopw


|
30 Posts in Topic:
|
Tux Wonder-Dog <wes.pa |
2008-02-27 21:54:43 |
|
Simon Morden <simon.mo |
2008-02-27 11:29:28 |
|
Tux Wonder-Dog <wes.pa |
2008-02-29 01:44:42 |
|
Crown-Horned Snorkack < |
2008-02-28 12:34:10 |
|
Crown-Horned Snorkack < |
2008-02-28 13:31:26 |
|
Brian Davis <brdavis@[ |
2008-02-29 05:49:28 |
|
Zombie Elvis <DELETEME |
2008-02-28 02:45:34 |
|
Larry Caldwell <firstn |
2008-02-28 19:35:22 |
|
Zombie Elvis <DELETEME |
2008-02-28 22:32:34 |
|
Erik Max Francis <max@ |
2008-02-28 20:38:37 |
|
Zombie Elvis <DELETEME |
2008-03-01 00:00:05 |
|
Tim Little <tim@[EMAIL |
2008-02-29 07:23:29 |
|
af250@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
2008-02-29 13:17:15 |
|
Brian Davis <brdavis@[ |
2008-02-29 05:32:10 |
|
Brian Davis <brdavis@[ |
2008-02-29 05:37:29 |
|
af250@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
2008-03-02 06:22:21 |
|
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
2008-02-28 20:43:05 |
|
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
2008-02-28 20:48:20 |
|
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
2008-02-28 21:37:06 |
|
Tim Little <tim@[EMAIL |
2008-02-29 02:27:17 |
|
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
2008-02-29 04:25:25 |
|
Tim Little <tim@[EMAIL |
2008-02-29 07:05:48 |
|
Erik Max Francis <max@ |
2008-02-29 00:22:37 |
|
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
2008-02-29 08:07:52 |
|
Tim Little <tim@[EMAIL |
2008-02-29 12:26:23 |
|
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
2008-02-29 08:24:40 |
|
Brian Davis <brdavis@[ |
2008-02-29 05:46:59 |
|
Dr J R Stockton <jrs@[ |
2008-02-29 17:57:33 |
|
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
2008-02-29 20:08:13 |
|
Tim Little <tim@[EMAIL |
2008-02-29 23:48:38 |
|
Post A Reply:

|
|
|
|