Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Science > Re: Negative En...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 10 of 12 Topic 3373 of 3638
Post > Topic >>

Re: Negative Energy

by Tim Little <tim@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 29, 2008 at 11:47 PM

On 2008-02-29, Erik Max Francis <max@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> The potential energy is not in the field itself, nor does the
> strength of the field change based on the arrangement of objects
> within it.

Electromagnetic fields do have energy, and the change in energy of a
charged object can be understood in terms of energy transfer between
the field and the object.

In the weak-field limit a similar property can be defined for
gravitational fields (with the field energy density being negative),
but it really doesn't work in general.


> The strength of a gravitational field depends on the mass of the
> gravitating body; for the gravitational field to "become more
> intense," it would have to increase in mass, which is clearly
> ludicrous.

An object falls to Earth.  It gains in kinetic energy, and its mass
now adds to Earth's mass, intensifying the field.  Not as ludicrous as
you try to make it sound.


- Tim
 




 12 Posts in Topic:
Negative Energy
WarLord <warlordbcm1@[  2008-02-21 17:09:01 
Re: Negative Energy
Luke Campbell <lwcamp@  2008-02-22 14:09:45 
Re: Negative Energy
WarLord <warlordbcm1@[  2008-02-24 10:01:21 
Re: Negative Energy
Luke Campbell <lwcamp@  2008-02-24 11:05:41 
Re: Negative Energy
Erik Max Francis <max@  2008-02-25 17:02:38 
Re: Negative Energy
Larry Caldwell <firstn  2008-02-28 19:14:13 
Re: Negative Energy
Erik Max Francis <max@  2008-02-28 20:37:13 
Re: Negative Energy
Larry Caldwell <firstn  2008-02-29 06:52:18 
Re: Negative Energy
Erik Max Francis <max@  2008-02-29 12:33:26 
Re: Negative Energy
Tim Little <tim@[EMAIL  2008-02-29 23:47:05 
Re: Negative Energy
Eivind Kjorstad <eivin  2008-03-03 08:40:56 
Re: Negative Energy
Tim Little <tim@[EMAIL  2008-03-03 08:15:39 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Thu Jul 24 13:04:48 CDT 2008.