Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Science > Re: Star-occult...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 6 of 8 Topic 3387 of 3876
Post > Topic >>

Re: Star-occulting sensors

by Tim Little <tim@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 1, 2008 at 11:52 AM

On 2008-03-01, Crown-Horned Snorkack <chornedsnorkack@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> For a pair of sensors 100 m away from each other, they are very
> different. Since the stars are infinitely far away, the shadow is
> about as big as the object that casts it.

They're a long way away, but not infinitely far away.  For example, a
Sun-sized star at 1000 light years subtends an angle of 1.5*10^-10
radians.  A 10m object at 1 AU subtends an angle of 6.7*10^-11
radians, and hence cannot completely eclipse the star.


- Tim
 




 8 Posts in Topic:
Star-occulting sensors
Russell Wallace <russe  2008-02-29 23:12:16 
Re: Star-occulting sensors
Arthur T. <arthur@[EMA  2008-02-29 18:32:49 
Re: Star-occulting sensors
Logan Kearsley <chrono  2008-02-29 15:43:48 
Re: Star-occulting sensors
Mike Williams <nospam@  2008-03-01 02:01:31 
Re: Star-occulting sensors
Crown-Horned Snorkack <  2008-03-01 00:43:00 
Re: Star-occulting sensors
Tim Little <tim@[EMAIL  2008-03-01 11:52:38 
Re: Star-occulting sensors
John Schilling <schill  2008-03-01 08:58:07 
Re: Star-occulting sensors
WaltBJ <waltbj01@[EMAI  2008-03-04 20:25:11 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Dec 4 0:07:24 CST 2008.