Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Science > Re: Gravity pro...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 4 Topic 3392 of 3639
Post > Topic >>

Re: Gravity profile up the beanstalk

by Simon Morden <simon.morden@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 2, 2008 at 11:26 PM

Tim Little wrote:
> On 2008-03-02, Simon Morden <simon.morden@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> 
>>This being the case, the waystation will have gravity (towards
>>Earth) pro****tional to r^2 minus that due to its rotational v? And
>>not in freefall as I've described in the first draft?
> 
> 
> Inversely pro****tional to r^2, where r = altitude + Earth's radius.
> Also subtract w^2 r, where w is the constant 2*pi/day angular speed.
> 
>

That's the fella. I do know this stuff (honest) but I seem to have 
tem****arily mislaid my brain.

Simon Morden
-- 
Visit the *all new* Book of Morden (www.bookofmorden.co.uk)
"I haven't had that much fun with a novel for a while." - Bookbag
The Lost Art - from David Fickling Books
 




 4 Posts in Topic:
Gravity profile up the beanstalk
Simon Morden <simon.mo  2008-03-02 22:07:55 
Re: Gravity profile up the beanstalk
Tim Little <tim@[EMAIL  2008-03-02 23:08:17 
Re: Gravity profile up the beanstalk
Simon Morden <simon.mo  2008-03-02 23:26:11 
Re: Gravity profile up the beanstalk
"Raven" <jon  2008-03-02 23:27:29 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Thu Jul 24 16:28:52 CDT 2008.