Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Science > Re: Negative En...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 12 of 12 Topic 3373 of 3876
Post > Topic >>

Re: Negative Energy

by Tim Little <tim@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 3, 2008 at 08:15 AM

On 2008-03-03, Eivind Kjorstad <eivindorama@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> You make it sound as if the gravity-field of earth is divided in a
> "inside" and "outside" part, which is false.

Odd, it doesn't sound like that to me.


It's not a difficult concept: suppose that the field has an "energy
density" pro****tional to the square of the acceleration due to gravity
at each point.

(This is exactly analogous to the case for electrostatic fields, with
electric field strength instead of gravitational acceleration)

A very distant mass does change the field, but only very weakly.  In
the limit where the separation is unbounded, the total field "energy"
is exactly the sum of the individual fields.

(This is also analogous to the case for electrostatic fields)

Choosing a suitable constant of pro****tionality and integrating over
all space gives a negative field "energy" that can be proven exactly
equal to the gravitational binding energy of all matter in the space.

(This once again is analogous to the case for electrostatic fields,
except that gravity has only one type of charge and the sign on the
constant of pro****tionality is reversed)


Note that this does not carry over to general relativity.  Energy
considerations are much more complex there.


- Tim
 




 12 Posts in Topic:
Negative Energy
WarLord <warlordbcm1@[  2008-02-21 17:09:01 
Re: Negative Energy
Luke Campbell <lwcamp@  2008-02-22 14:09:45 
Re: Negative Energy
WarLord <warlordbcm1@[  2008-02-24 10:01:21 
Re: Negative Energy
Luke Campbell <lwcamp@  2008-02-24 11:05:41 
Re: Negative Energy
Erik Max Francis <max@  2008-02-25 17:02:38 
Re: Negative Energy
Larry Caldwell <firstn  2008-02-28 19:14:13 
Re: Negative Energy
Erik Max Francis <max@  2008-02-28 20:37:13 
Re: Negative Energy
Larry Caldwell <firstn  2008-02-29 06:52:18 
Re: Negative Energy
Erik Max Francis <max@  2008-02-29 12:33:26 
Re: Negative Energy
Tim Little <tim@[EMAIL  2008-02-29 23:47:05 
Re: Negative Energy
Eivind Kjorstad <eivin  2008-03-03 08:40:56 
Re: Negative Energy
Tim Little <tim@[EMAIL  2008-03-03 08:15:39 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Dec 4 0:39:24 CST 2008.