Re: opposite of relativistic time contraction

I did find a source for the claim that time goes significantly slower
in a void:

http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2007/12/21/2124258.htm?site=science&topic=latest

They give the same 18 billion year figure that Bryan gave.

They don't give any explicit reference to the paper they're talking
about, but I think it might be this one:

http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/1367-2630/9/10/377/njp7_10_377.html

Wayne Throop wrote:
 > Further, as somebody pointed out, to commute to this remote location
and
 > back would cost you more in time dilation than you reap, so your total
 > proper time on such a trip would be shorter than if you'd stayed home.

Agreed.