Re: Another dumb black hole question (charge and acceleration)

WizWom wrote:

> And Erik proves again that he is only marginally aware of things.

Hey!  It's great you're back.  Things have been relatively quiet lately 
and we could always use some humor.

What, pray tell, did I get only marginally aware-ish?  I'd love to hear 
criticism from the guy who has basically blown nearly every technical 
point in every single post to this newsgroup so far ... to the point of 
thinking Einstein didn't really mean that simultaneity is relative when 
summed up the chapter on simultaneity -- cough -- with a paragraph 
explicitly stating that simultaneity is not absolute and thus relative. 
  Oops!

Your new view of general relativity should be quite entertaining.  Not 
enlightening, really, but hey, it's a start.

-- 
Erik Max Francis && max@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 && http://www.alcyone.com/max/
  San Jose, CA, USA && 37 18 N 121 57 W && AIM, Y!M erikmaxfrancis
   There is no evil in the atom; only in men's souls.
    -- Adlai Stevenson, 1952