Terry Austin <taustinca@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
:Fred J. McCall <fmccall@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
:news:eaktu3tctg5d0vh4n29jc0u15svm33et9f@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
:> Terry Austin <taustinca@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
:>
:>:Fred J. McCall <fmccall@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
:>:news:j0ssu3dern9assst0hk9gcgmhjhblkr3gg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
:>:> Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
:>:>
:>:>:Fred J. McCall <fmccall@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
:>:>:news:rqsou3dr3pfq3ukmkssjjfkmso6r1s9i1n@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
:>:>:
:>:>:> Tim Little <tim@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
:>:>:>
:>:>:>:On 2008-03-28, Fred J McCall <fmccall@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
:>:>:>:> Mark_Reichert@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:>:>:>:>:And lunch time is....?
:>:>:>:>
:>:>:>:> For not using your boss's assets.
:>:>:>:
:>:>:>:Not everyone works for a boss who is the sole proprietor of
:>:>:>:their company. In any case, I'll be sure to remove myself from
:>:>:>:the property every time I eat lunch in future. Chairs,
:>:>:>:lighting, tables, sink, garbage bin, ... all involve use of
:>:>:>:assets that do not belong to me. Or I could realise that I am
:>:>:>:generally permitted to use these assets for personal purposes
:>:>:>:where it does not negatively affect the work being done.
:>:>:>:
:>:>:>:In either event, there is definitely a major security and
:>:>:>:maintenance difference between installing dedicated software for
:>:>:>:newsreading vs using a web interface via software already
:>:>:>:installed and configured.
:>:>:>:
:>:>:>
:>:>:> Both are using network access that your employer pays for. This
:>:>:> impacts everyone else.
:>:>:>
:>:>:
:>:>:At most business locations, it has literally no detectable effect.
:>:>:
:>:>
:>:> If it's only one person. Now multiply.
:>:
:>:And? Still no detectable effect. Usenet is a text medium, son. Even
:>:with a relatively slow DSL connection, it it literally impossible to
:>:type fast enough to raise network traffic enough to detect, even with
:>:hundreds of employees participating.
:>
:> So obviously you don't need a network for whatever the hell it is you
:> do.
:
:As I said, no detectable effect. Routine windows traffic exceeds what
:usenet uses by a couple orders of magnitude.
Who cares what you said? Hell, man, given the evidence so far I
wouldn't believe you if you insisted that water was wet.
:>
:>:>
:>:>:And at many, they don't care if employees do personal internetting
:>:>:on their lunch break.
:>:>
:>:> Have you asked them?
:>:
:>:I *am* them, dumbass. I've seen the research that shows that letting
:>:employees do reasonable things online, like shopping, or checking
:>:their personal email, or hitting a forum or usenet, actually makes
:>:them more productive, as they have less incentive to take time off
:>:from work to handle personal issues (not to mention morale issues).
:>
:> So what are you so defensive about then, dip****?
:
:You're the one who is defensive, and now resorting to namecalling when
:youv'e been proven to be a retard who doesn't know his ass from a hole in
:the ground about computer networks. It's surprising you can manage to
:turn one on and off.
Given the vomit you're spewing, complaints of "name calling" are
particularly amusing.
So your position is that Usenet uses ZERO bytes on the network?
Because if it uses more than that those are bytes that aren't
available for something else.
:>
:>:>
:>:>:Just beacuse you work for an asshole doesn't
:>:>:mean everyone does.
:>:>
:>:> I don't recall saying anything at all about who I work for or what
:>:> their policies are.
:>:
:>:You don't need to. That you literally cannot conceive of working
:>:conditions that do not quality in my book as "working for an asshole"
:>:is evidence enough.
:>
:> How'd you get a book up your ass so you could see it?
:
:So you agree with me, then. Openly, in a public forum, you admit I was
:right.
Still delusional, I see.
:>
:> You're too stupid to be on Usenet, sonny.
:
:Again, you prove, conclusively, that you are mentally retarded. There
:isn't a lower limit. One *can't* be too stupid to be one usenet, son. If
:it were possible, you wouldn't be allowed here. Retard.
Oooo, I'm cut. Say 'retard' often enough and maybe I'll cry or
something.
:>
:> In case you didn't notice it, you lot just started crossposting this
:> little food fight of yours outside whatever Ghu-forsaken group morons
:> like you stem from.
:
:And what does this have to do with the fact that you *obviously* don't
:know you ass from a hole in the ground about compuer networks and
:bandwidth usage? Or is that just another admission that you know you're
:full of ****, and have known it all along?
It has nothing at all to do with any of your delusions, ****wit.
:>
:>:>
:>:> Just because you're a delusional innumerate moron doesn't mean
:>:> everyone is.
:>:>
:>:Just because you want to suck my dick doesn't mean I'm going to let
:>:you.
:>
:> Just because you wish you had a dick for other men to suck doesn't
:> mean you do ... or they will.
:
:Pervert.
You're the one who brought up men sucking your dick, not I.
:>
:>:
:>:Smart employers don't give a **** what their employees do, so long as
:>:it's legal and reasonable, on their lunch hour, including posting to
:>:usenet. But smart companies *do* care about employees installing
:>:software on their desktops, and many (including me) aren't too
:>:thrilled about employees using Outlook or Outlook Express for *any*
:>:purpose, since it is bug-ridden ****. That means that usenet is OK,
:>:but not a usenet client, which leaves limited (and, frankly, broken)
:>:options like DejaGoogle.
:>:
:>
:> Sorry to hear you're a moron.
:
:I know you are, but what am I?
Wow, impressive!
:>
:> As someone else noted, most real companies load Outlook and/or Outlook
:> Express routinely.
:
:That was me, retard, and no, "real companies" don't load Outlook Express,
:it comes with Windows and is actually difficult to get rid of. If you
:weren't an illiterate retard, you'd have gotten it right.
So 'real companies' don't load Windows? Jesus, the illogic never ends
with you, does it?
:
:What does that have to do with what I said?
:>
:>:Fact is, 'tard-boy, you're wrong, and obviously wrong, in a
:>:"completely, totally full of ****" sort of way. Get over it, son, and
:>:move on.
:>
:> Oh, I see.
:
:I have doubts.
Talk to your analyst.
:
:> Why don't you crawl back under your bridge, find your
:> tweezers and magnifying glass, and go back to playing with yourself
:> and leave the sane people alone?
:>
:Make me, you retarded, passive/aggressive little *****. If you're man
:enough. Which we all know you're not.
Ah, the smell of overcompensation is in the air...
:
:You will now reply. Because you *can't* stop yourself, being my ***** and
:all.
Does this sort of sophomoric attempt to 'win' by having 'the last
word' EVER work for you?
Now, you go ahead and have the last word. After all, I wouldn't want
you to cry or anything.
--
"The terrifying power of the human *** drive is horrifically
demonstrated by the fact that someone was willing to father you."
-- Ipso Fatso
|
