Fred J. McCall <fmccall@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:icsuu39tc1i2k4acmdepbtuaem88849hdt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Terry Austin <taustinca@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>:Fred J. McCall <fmccall@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>:news:eaktu3tctg5d0vh4n29jc0u15svm33et9f@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
>:> Terry Austin <taustinca@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>:>
>:>:Fred J. McCall <fmccall@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>:>:news:j0ssu3dern9assst0hk9gcgmhjhblkr3gg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:>:
>:>:> Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>:>:>
>:>:>:Fred J. McCall <fmccall@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>:>:>:news:rqsou3dr3pfq3ukmkssjjfkmso6r1s9i1n@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:>:>:
>:>:>:> Tim Little <tim@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>:>:>:>
>:>:>:>:On 2008-03-28, Fred J McCall <fmccall@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>:>:>:>:> Mark_Reichert@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>:>:>:>:>:And lunch time is....?
>:>:>:>:>
>:>:>:>:> For not using your boss's assets.
>:>:>:>:
>:>:>:>:Not everyone works for a boss who is the sole proprietor of
>:>:>:>:their company. In any case, I'll be sure to remove myself from
>:>:>:>:the property every time I eat lunch in future. Chairs,
>:>:>:>:lighting, tables, sink, garbage bin, ... all involve use of
>:>:>:>:assets that do not belong to me. Or I could realise that I am
>:>:>:>:generally permitted to use these assets for personal purposes
>:>:>:>:where it does not negatively affect the work being done.
>:>:>:>:
>:>:>:>:In either event, there is definitely a major security and
>:>:>:>:maintenance difference between installing dedicated software for
>:>:>:>:newsreading vs using a web interface via software already
>:>:>:>:installed and configured.
>:>:>:>:
>:>:>:>
>:>:>:> Both are using network access that your employer pays for. This
>:>:>:> impacts everyone else.
>:>:>:>
>:>:>:
>:>:>:At most business locations, it has literally no detectable effect.
>:>:>:
>:>:>
>:>:> If it's only one person. Now multiply.
>:>:
>:>:And? Still no detectable effect. Usenet is a text medium, son. Even
>:>:with a relatively slow DSL connection, it it literally impossible to
>:>:type fast enough to raise network traffic enough to detect, even
>:>:with hundreds of employees participating.
>:>
>:> So obviously you don't need a network for whatever the hell it is
>:> you do.
>:
>:As I said, no detectable effect. Routine windows traffic exceeds what
>:usenet uses by a couple orders of magnitude.
>
> Who cares what you said?
Anybody who is interested in how things atually work.
> Hell, man, given the evidence so far I
> wouldn't believe you if you insisted that water was wet.
That would be a sign of your mental retadation, and not knowing ****
about computer networks.
>
>:>
>:>:>
>:>:>:And at many, they don't care if employees do personal internetting
>:>:>:on their lunch break.
>:>:>
>:>:> Have you asked them?
>:>:
>:>:I *am* them, dumbass. I've seen the research that shows that letting
>:>:employees do reasonable things online, like shopping, or checking
>:>:their personal email, or hitting a forum or usenet, actually makes
>:>:them more productive, as they have less incentive to take time off
>:>:from work to handle personal issues (not to mention morale issues).
>:>
>:> So what are you so defensive about then, dip****?
>:
>:You're the one who is defensive, and now resorting to namecalling when
>:youv'e been proven to be a retard who doesn't know his ass from a hole
>:in the ground about computer networks. It's surprising you can manage
>:to turn one on and off.
>
> Given the vomit you're spewing, complaints of "name calling" are
> particularly amusing.
You started it, pookie.
>
> So your position is that Usenet uses ZERO bytes on the network?
Feel free to cite a MessageID where I said that, liar-boy.
> Because if it uses more than that those are bytes that aren't
> available for something else.
And, being profoundly retarded, as you are, you cannot conceive, as those
of us who know our ass from a hole in the ground, that virtually all
networks have excess capacity that simply goes to waste. That, in fact,
that excess capacity is a necessary part of the network design criteria,
to ensure capacity for peak times (when employees would be, perhaps,
doing their jobs, instead of taking a break)
Duh. Retard.
>
>:>
>:>:>
>:>:>:Just beacuse you work for an asshole doesn't
>:>:>:mean everyone does.
>:>:>
>:>:> I don't recall saying anything at all about who I work for or what
>:>:> their policies are.
>:>:
>:>:You don't need to. That you literally cannot conceive of working
>:>:conditions that do not quality in my book as "working for an
>:>:asshole" is evidence enough.
>:>
>:> How'd you get a book up your ass so you could see it?
>:
>:So you agree with me, then. Openly, in a public forum, you admit I was
>:right.
>
> Still delusional, I see.
I know you are, but what am I?
>
>:>
>:> You're too stupid to be on Usenet, sonny.
>:
>:Again, you prove, conclusively, that you are mentally retarded. There
>:isn't a lower limit. One *can't* be too stupid to be one usenet, son.
>:If it were possible, you wouldn't be allowed here. Retard.
>
> Oooo, I'm cut. Say 'retard' often enough and maybe I'll cry or
> something.
I don't doubt it for a second. Doesn't change how retarded you are.
>
>:>
>:> In case you didn't notice it, you lot just started crossposting this
>:> little food fight of yours outside whatever Ghu-forsaken group
>:> morons like you stem from.
>:
>:And what does this have to do with the fact that you *obviously* don't
>:know you ass from a hole in the ground about compuer networks and
>:bandwidth usage? Or is that just another admission that you know
>:you're full of ****, and have known it all along?
>
> It has nothing at all to do with any of your delusions, ****wit.
Good of you to admit you're just making **** up to try to distract anyone
reading this from the fact that you don't know **** about computer
networks and how they work.
>
>:>
>:>:>
>:>:> Just because you're a delusional innumerate moron doesn't mean
>:>:> everyone is.
>:>:>
>:>:Just because you want to suck my dick doesn't mean I'm going to let
>:>:you.
>:>
>:> Just because you wish you had a dick for other men to suck doesn't
>:> mean you do ... or they will.
>:
>:Pervert.
>
> You're the one who brought up men sucking your dick, not I.
More lies. You beg to suck my dick, I'm bound to comment on it. Pervert.
>
>:>
>:>:
>:>:Smart employers don't give a **** what their employees do, so long
>:>:as it's legal and reasonable, on their lunch hour, including posting
>:>:to usenet. But smart companies *do* care about employees installing
>:>:software on their desktops, and many (including me) aren't too
>:>:thrilled about employees using Outlook or Outlook Express for *any*
>:>:purpose, since it is bug-ridden ****. That means that usenet is OK,
>:>:but not a usenet client, which leaves limited (and, frankly, broken)
>:>:options like DejaGoogle.
>:>:
>:>
>:> Sorry to hear you're a moron.
>:
>:I know you are, but what am I?
>
> Wow, impressive!
Yes, I am. Now answer the question, retard.
>
>:>
>:> As someone else noted, most real companies load Outlook and/or
>:> Outlook Express routinely.
>:
>:That was me, retard, and no, "real companies" don't load Outlook
>:Express, it comes with Windows and is actually difficult to get rid
>:of. If you weren't an illiterate retard, you'd have gotten it right.
>
> So 'real companies' don't load Windows? Jesus, the illogic never ends
> with you, does it?
Retard.
>
>:
>:What does that have to do with what I said?
>:>
>:>:Fact is, 'tard-boy, you're wrong, and obviously wrong, in a
>:>:"completely, totally full of ****" sort of way. Get over it, son,
>:>:and move on.
>:>
>:> Oh, I see.
>:
>:I have doubts.
>
> Talk to your analyst.
>
Talk to your mummy. Ask her for a cookie.
>:
>:> Why don't you crawl back under your bridge, find your
>:> tweezers and magnifying glass, and go back to playing with yourself
>:> and leave the sane people alone?
>:>
>:Make me, you retarded, passive/aggressive little *****. If you're man
>:enough. Which we all know you're not.
>
> Ah, the smell of overcompensation is in the air...
Which is to say, you know you're a *****, and not man enough to take me.
*****.
>
>:
>:You will now reply. Because you *can't* stop yourself, being my *****
>:and all.
>
> Does this sort of sophomoric attempt to 'win' by having 'the last
> word' EVER work for you?
Every. Single. Time.
>
> Now, you go ahead and have the last word. After all, I wouldn't want
> you to cry or anything.
>
You will now reply, because you're still my *****, and *can't* stop
yourself.
Plus, it's all the attention you ever get. *****.
--
Terry Austin
"Dude, we're all your *****, but only Ken's wearing the juice."
- tussock
"Just throw a rock, and what screams will probably be a moron."
- Elvis (no, not that Elvis)
|
