On Mar 30, 1:15=A0am, Terry Austin <tausti...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Fred J. McCall <fmcc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
innews:eaktu3tctg5d0vh4n29jc0=
u15svm33et9f@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
> > Terry Austin <tausti...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >:Fred J. McCall <fmcc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> >:news:j0ssu3dern9assst0hk9gcgmhjhblkr3gg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >:
> >:> Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <tausti...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >:>
> >:>:Fred J. McCall <fmcc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> >:>:news:rqsou3dr3pfq3ukmkssjjfkmso6r1s9i1n@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >:>:
> >:>:> Tim Little <t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >:>:>
> >:>:>:On 2008-03-28, Fred J =A0McCall <fmcc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >:>:>:> Mark_Reich...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >:>:>:>:And lunch time is....?
> >:>:>:>
> >:>:>:> For not using your boss's assets.
> >:>:>:
> >:>:>:Not everyone works for a boss who is the sole proprietor of
> >:>:>:their company. =A0In any case, I'll be sure to remove myself from
> >:>:>:the property every time I eat lunch in future. =A0Chairs,
> >:>:>:lighting, tables, sink, garbage bin, ... all involve use of
> >:>:>:assets that do not belong to me. Or I could realise that I am
> >:>:>:generally permitted to use these assets for personal purposes
> >:>:>:where it does not negatively affect the work being done.
> >:>:>:
> >:>:>:In either event, there is definitely a major security and
> >:>:>:maintenance difference between installing dedicated software for
> >:>:>:newsreading vs using a web interface via software already
> >:>:>:installed and configured.
> >:>:>:
> >:>:>
> >:>:> Both are using network access that your employer pays for. =A0This
> >:>:> impacts everyone else.
> >:>:>
> >:>:
> >:>:At most business locations, it has literally no detectable effect.
> >:>:
> >:>
> >:> If it's only one person. =A0Now multiply.
> >:
> >:And? Still no detectable effect. Usenet is a text medium, son. Even
> >:with a relatively slow DSL connection, it it literally impossible to
> >:type fast enough to raise network traffic enough to detect, even with
> >:hundreds of employees participating.
>
> > So obviously you don't need a network for whatever the hell it is you
> > do.
>
> As I said, no detectable effect. Routine windows traffic exceeds what
> usenet uses by a couple orders of magnitude.
>
>
>
> >:>
> >:>:And at many, they don't care if employees do personal internetting
> >:>:on their lunch break.
> >:>
> >:> Have you asked them?
> >:
> >:I *am* them, dumbass. I've seen the research that shows that letting
> >:employees do reasonable things online, like shopping, or checking
> >:their personal email, or hitting a forum or usenet, actually makes
> >:them more productive, as they have less incentive to take time off
> >:from work to handle personal issues (not to mention morale issues).
>
> > So what are you so defensive about then, dip****?
>
> You're the one who is defensive, and now resorting to namecalling when
> youv'e been proven to be a retard who doesn't know his ass from a hole
in
> the ground about computer networks. It's surprising you can manage to
> turn one on and off.
>
>
>
> >:>
> >:>:Just beacuse you work for an asshole doesn't
> >:>:mean everyone does.
> >:>
> >:> I don't recall saying anything at all about who I work for or what
> >:> their policies are.
> >:
> >:You don't need to. That you literally cannot conceive of working
> >:conditions that do not quality in my book as "working for an asshole"
> >:is evidence enough.
>
> > How'd you get a book up your ass so you could see it?
>
> So you agree with me, then. Openly, in a public forum, you admit I was
> right.
>
>
>
> > You're too stupid to be on Usenet, sonny.
>
> Again, you prove, conclusively, that you are mentally retarded. There
> isn't a lower limit. One *can't* be too stupid to be one usenet, son. If
> it were possible, you wouldn't be allowed here. Retard.
>
>
>
> > In case you didn't notice it, you lot just started crossposting this
> > little food fight of yours outside whatever Ghu-forsaken group morons
> > like you stem from.
>
> And what does this have to do with the fact that you *obviously* don't
> know you ass from a hole in the ground about compuer networks and
> bandwidth usage? Or is that just another admission that you know you're
> full of ****, and have known it all along?
>
>
>
> >:>
> >:> Just because you're a delusional innumerate moron doesn't mean
> >:> everyone is.
> >:>
> >:Just because you want to suck my dick doesn't mean I'm going to let
> >:you.
>
> > Just because you wish you had a dick for other men to suck doesn't
> > mean you do ... or they will.
>
> Pervert.
>
>
>
> >:
> >:Smart employers don't give a **** what their employees do, so long as
> >:it's legal and reasonable, on their lunch hour, including posting to
> >:usenet. But smart companies *do* care about employees installing
> >:software on their desktops, and many (including me) aren't too
> >:thrilled about employees using Outlook or Outlook Express for *any*
> >:purpose, since it is bug-ridden ****. That means that usenet is OK,
> >:but not a usenet client, which leaves limited (and, frankly, broken)
> >:options like DejaGoogle.
> >:
>
> > Sorry to hear you're a moron.
>
> I know you are, but what am I?
>
>
>
> > As someone else noted, most real companies load Outlook and/or Outlook
> > Express routinely.
>
> That was me, retard, and no, "real companies" don't load Outlook
Express,
> it comes with Windows and is actually difficult to get rid of. If you
> weren't an illiterate retard, you'd have gotten it right.
>
> What does that have to do with what I said?
>
>
>
> >:Fact is, 'tard-boy, you're wrong, and obviously wrong, in a
> >:"completely, totally full of ****" sort of way. Get over it, son, and
> >:move on.
>
> > Oh, I see. =A0
>
> I have doubts.
>
> > Why don't you crawl back under your bridge, find your
> > tweezers and magnifying glass, and go back to playing with yourself
> > and leave the sane people alone?
>
> Make me, you retarded, passive/aggressive little *****. If you're man
> enough. Which we all know you're not.
>
> You will now reply. Because you *can't* stop yourself, being my *****
and
> all.
>
> --
> Terry Austin
> "Dude, we're all your *****, but only Ken's wearing the juice."
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0
=
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0- tussock
>
> "Just throw a rock, and what screams will probably be a moron."
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0
=
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0- Elvis (no, not that Elvis)- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Terry, you umbrella carrying sissie, you wouldn't know how to run a
business if it was stuck up your butt. You give your people their
work to do, and if they perform the work correctly, and up to your
standards, then they can take a ****ing nap at their desks for all I
care. That is how you get work out of people, tell them what you
expect, and when they give it, let them do what the hell they want. I
own two businesses, and I tell my outside salesman that they can play
golf all day, sleep under a tree, whatever, but at the end of the
month, a certain amout of G.P. better be under their name on the
printout. Guess what? They always come through, only had to fire a
few over the twenty five years. So, you don't have to be an asshole,
just tell them what you expect, and let them decide if they can
produce or not. You obviously are not a manager of anybody. As well
as carrying a damn umbrella, rain doesn't hurt you, you ignore weather
as there is nothing you can do about it. Except if it's -20, or golf
ball size hail. Be a real man instead of a "fluffer" in men's ****o.
Why do you do that? Do you have any idea where those have been?
Jesus, sissie boy.
"Throw a moron and probably what screams will be a umbrella carrying
sissie."
Ken (Yes, that Ken)
|
