Re: Hillary needs to quit

Mike Van Pelt wrote:
> In article <ANIM8Rfsk-7C0265.08263404042008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> Anim8rFSK  <ANIM8Rfsk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> [Obama] Wants to shut down NASA for 5 years, maintaining
>> only the bureaucrats, use the money to fix education, and
>> then start NASA right back up again without missing a beat.
>
> Good grief. Now, if he said he wanted to fire all the
> bureaucrats and keep the part of NASA that actually does
> stuff, I might be convinced to vote for him. If he said shut
> it down and get rid of the bureaucrats too, then, OK, he'd be
> consistent.
>
> But to fire all the people who actually accomplish real
> things, and keep all the useless paper-shuffling bureaucrats
> when there's not even a pretense of them having anything to
> do, and to have this bizarre delusion that after five years,
> all the people with the technical knowledge and skills
> would just be waiting to be called back to work, their
> skills unforgotten, and their equipment, looked over only by
> bureaucrats, working just as it was when they left it...
>
> Anyone who says anything like that is either a moron or a
> liar who things his audience is all morons.
>
> Please tell me Obama didn't really propose anything so mindless.

I'm betting he didn't.  I've yet to see a cite to back up this garbage. 
Or 
even a bogus quote attributed to him.  Don't be so freaking gullible.