Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Science > Re: The Future ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 3464 of 3510
Post > Topic >>

Re: The Future of Chess and Getting It "Unstuck"

by Tim Little <tim@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 18, 2008 at 09:34 PM

On 2008-04-19, John Bailey <john_bailey@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> That is to say, any classical simulation of quantum evolution
> involves an exponential slowdown in time compared with the natural
> evolution

Which exactly proves the point you're arguing against.  It's possible,
just slow.


> Having said (and quoted) all that--the question is: Would a set of
> simple extensions to the rules in the spirit of Schrodinger's Cat
> Chess make it impossible for a computer other than a Quantum
> Computer to make 40 moves within 2 hours?

Theoretically, or practically?

This being crossposted to sci.math, I'll answer purely theoretically:
no.

As a bonus, I'll also answer practically: no.  We don't have any
quantum computers of complexity sufficient to do anything that
ordinary computers can't.  Far from it, in fact.  And I think there
are good reasons (exponential sensitivity of coherence) to expect that
we never will.

There may be a "yes" somewhere in between - in the realm of science
fiction, beyond what the universe permits but short of what
mathematics considers.  Hence rec.arts.sf.science added to the
groups list.


- Tim




 1 Posts in Topic:
Re: The Future of Chess and Getting It "Unstuck"
Tim Little <tim@[EMAIL  2008-04-18 21:34:51 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sat May 17 11:40:17 CDT 2008.