Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Science > Re: CERN Atom S...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 2 Topic 3468 of 3599
Post > Topic >>

Re: CERN Atom Smasher May End the World

by Erik Max Francis <max@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 20, 2008 at 08:07 PM

Wayne Throop wrote:

> : Larry Caldwell <firstnamelastinitial@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> : You also seem to be hung up on conservation of charge, which has
> : been determined to be invalid for decades now.
> 
> Who determined it and when?  And why does everybody still think black
holes
> are characterized by mass, spin, and charge?

Oh, right.  I was reviewing past posts by the guy and he's the same one 
that couldn't even get conservation of energy right when dealing with 
vector force fields (he thought objects falling through a force field 
use up the energy in that field, rather than trading potential for 
kinetic energy).

Which I think I can speak for itself.

-- 
Erik Max Francis && max@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 && http://www.alcyone.com/max/
  San Jose, CA, USA && 37 18 N 121 57 W && AIM, Y!M erikmaxfrancis
   Money talks / But love is for real / And you know that
    -- Neneh Cherry
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
Re: CERN Atom Smasher May End the World
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 02:23:00 
Re: CERN Atom Smasher May End the World
Erik Max Francis <max@  2008-04-20 20:07:10 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sun Jul 6 17:15:02 CDT 2008.