Re: Non-constant time rate

: Ivan Voras <ivoras@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
: True. But what if you kind of presume some things as absolute, for=20
: example that an object in motion will cross the same distance in the=20
: same time (Newton's 1st)? Could you, with the anomalies proposed and=20
: with sufficiently precise measurements, find out that it isn't always
so?=

Why would you think the object would take longer?
Just because proper time is passing slower doesn't imply that.
But, if you pitched a clock through such a region, anc compared
it to a clock left outside the region, then it's easy to detect.
Indeed, if you allow checks on things outside the region, or probe
objects to b e sent into and gotten out of the region, then it seems
almost to trivial to menion that they can be detected.


Wayne Throop   throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://sheol.org/throopw