Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Science > Re: Having seen...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 17 of 55 Topic 3493 of 3793
Post > Topic >>

Re: Having seen Iron Man

by "nuny@[EMAIL PROTECTED] " <Alien8752@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 11, 2008 at 02:11 PM

On May 11, 11:37 am, Terry Austin <tausti...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Bryan Derksen <bryan.derk...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
innews:_qFVj.131802$Cj7.83117@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Ben Crowell wrote:
> >> James Nicoll wrote:
> >>>      How many uses can you think of for a multiple gigwatt generator
> >>> that has no waste heat or radiation issues, that is smaller than a
> >>> block of butter?

  Pretty much any SFnal killer app requiring "only" a magically high-
energy-density power source.

  OTOH abovethread James Nicoll points out that the prototype put out
"only" 3 GW for "only" 15 minutes. Obvious questions include- if you
dial the power drain down how much longer does it last- is there a
materials limit that makes it last only that long or what? Was it just
the prototype that had the time limit (they tend to do that)?
Alternatively, can you get TW bursts out of it? What's the max
possible short-term power drain without it going BOOM? If you don't
mind it going BOOM, how big a BOOM can you get? Don't look at me like
that; Stark _is_ a Defense contractor.

> >> Is it a heat engine? If so, then my proposed use for it would be to
> >> use it to obtain the Nobel prize for overthrowing the laws of
> >> thermodynamics.
>
> > The impression I got from the movie was that it was nuclear in some
> > way, nothing physics-breaking.  The details don't really matter,
> > though.

  How else to get that kind of power out of a butter-stick-sized
thingy controllably?

> The mention of palladium while building the prototype suggests cold
fusion,
> without saying it. So, for values of "nothing physics-breaking" that
> include stuff that's used as the punch line at the water cooler among
real
> phycists.

  Considering the waste heat issues in the "real-world" embodiments of
so-called Cold Fusion, it better be Frozen Solid Fusion.

  (Grounds for speculation; it says here:

http://skua.gps.caltech.edu/hermann/ice.htm

  that "Proton conduction in ice and H-bonded materials is analogous
to electron conduction in semiconductors." So, maybe a block of Ice IX-
Argon clathrate with Palladium contacts?)

> But then, it *is* a comic book.

  I useta read the comics but haven't seen the movie yet, so mu.

> Tommie Kratman will reply to this, because that's why my ***** does.

  What _is_ that thing attached to your leg, and why is it flapping up
and down like that... oh. Ew. Never mind.


  Mark L. Fergerson
 




 55 Posts in Topic:
Having seen Iron Man
jdnicoll@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-11 16:06:30 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
jdnicoll@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-11 16:06:58 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Ben Crowell <crowell08  2008-05-11 09:26:30 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Bryan Derksen <bryan.d  2008-05-11 16:47:54 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Ben Crowell <crowell08  2008-05-11 09:56:02 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Bryan Derksen <bryan.d  2008-05-11 17:32:35 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Ben Crowell <crowell08  2008-05-11 15:08:29 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Bryan Derksen <bryan.d  2008-05-12 03:15:23 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Erik Max Francis <max@  2008-05-11 20:53:04 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
jdnicoll@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-11 17:04:10 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-05-11 18:37:56 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
jdnicoll@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-11 17:00:14 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Bryan Derksen <bryan.d  2008-05-11 17:36:28 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-05-11 18:39:48 
Re: Having seen Austeniteman
Herr Oberst <nrvlaw@[E  2008-05-11 12:13:08 
Re: Having seen Austeniteman
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-05-11 20:02:02 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
"nuny@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-11 14:11:15 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Bryan Derksen <bryan.d  2008-05-12 03:19:46 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-05-12 05:04:31 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-05-12 05:02:42 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Allen Thomson <thomson  2008-05-11 14:41:49 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Bryan Derksen <bryan.d  2008-05-12 03:24:09 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Remus Shepherd <remus@  2008-05-12 14:29:00 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Steve Hix <sehix@[EMAI  2008-05-11 14:19:34 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
David Johnston <david@  2008-05-11 22:17:49 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Michael Ash <mike@[EMA  2008-05-11 17:24:50 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Dr J R Stockton <jrs@[  2008-05-12 17:04:28 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
jdnicoll@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-12 17:34:27 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Dr J R Stockton <jrs@[  2008-05-12 19:31:44 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
mvp@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-05-16 07:03:07 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Tim Little <tim@[EMAIL  2008-05-16 03:42:36 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Erik Max Francis <max@  2008-05-16 02:09:11 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Michael Ash <mike@[EMA  2008-05-16 04:24:03 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Erik Max Francis <max@  2008-05-16 02:41:07 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Michael Ash <mike@[EMA  2008-05-16 04:52:23 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Eivind <eivindorama@[E  2008-05-16 12:19:32 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Matthias Warkus <Warku  2008-05-16 15:44:02 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Eivind <eivindorama@[E  2008-05-19 09:40:54 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
George W Harris <gharr  2008-05-16 08:47:56 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Erik Max Francis <max@  2008-05-17 14:51:49 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
George W Harris <gharr  2008-05-17 20:05:12 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
John Schilling <schill  2008-05-17 06:34:41 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Erik Max Francis <max@  2008-05-17 14:55:33 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
John Schilling <schill  2008-05-17 19:26:28 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Erik Max Francis <max@  2008-05-17 20:59:26 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Michael Ash <mike@[EMA  2008-05-17 23:40:14 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
naddy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-18 13:01:14 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
naddy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-17 16:19:05 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Erik Max Francis <max@  2008-05-17 14:53:42 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Michael Ash <mike@[EMA  2008-05-17 20:33:44 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Erik Max Francis <max@  2008-05-17 20:58:21 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Michael Ash <mike@[EMA  2008-05-17 23:43:25 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
Erik Max Francis <max@  2008-05-17 21:55:33 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
mvp@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-05-18 00:31:52 
Re: Having seen Iron Man
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-16 17:40:14 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Oct 15 18:37:43 CDT 2008.