Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Science > Re: Just to be ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 31 of 31 Topic 3490 of 3876
Post > Topic >>

Re: Just to be sure: Planet with multiple moons

by Erik Max Francis <max@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 17, 2008 at 10:08 PM

Wayne Throop wrote:

> Yeah, I know, you meant "pretend the camera is being held by an amateur
> with palsy and has no image stabilization feature".  But deliberately
> introducing gratuitous camera motions is the general category that
> includes both.  Both are fourth-wall-breaking, pretty much.  In the
> case of turbulence-cam, it behaves as if there's a physical object that
> represents the viewpoint, which draws the attention to the fact that,
> in fact, there isn't, or shouldn't be.  Traditional shaky-cam draws
> attention to the fact that, gosh, there is a cam and a camera operator
> and a whole crew out of sight of what you're looking at.

I don't disagree with you; it just bugs me less.  The constant in-person 
shaky-cam is really annoying.  The artificial camera motions that 
suggest the camera is somewhere it couldn't possibly be are somewhat 
less so to me.

> Now, shaky-cam motions representing pilot head movement, or even
shaky-cam
> motions representing an actual physical object, like the plane one is
> seemingly aboard, are less distracting, at least to me.

They're in between what you describe above and the blatant shaky-cam for 
me.  For instance, the artificial jerky zooming and panning we see a lot 
in a series like _Battlestar Galactica_, which is overdone, especially 
in what are essentially "static" shots of the fleet.

> Yes, good point.  I presumed it was showing actual latitude and
> longitude; an arguably useful feature... except that it's so faint that
> it's only a background annoyance instead of anything actually useful.
> And as you point out, it seems to be done in shots where it makes
> no sense.

It's sometimes attached to the CGI when they're zooming and panning 
around, but even then there's often this digital noise scrolling and 
panning by.  The noise attached to the grid looks technical, but doesn't 
appear to be anything coherent (and there's an awful lot of it).

-- 
Erik Max Francis && max@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 && http://www.alcyone.com/max/
  San Jose, CA, USA && 37 18 N 121 57 W && AIM, Y!M erikmaxfrancis
   The cost of living has gone up another dollar a quart.
    -- W.C. Fields
 




 31 Posts in Topic:
Just to be sure: Planet with multiple moons
Peter Knutsen <peter@[  2008-05-08 18:36:32 
Re: Just to be sure: Planet with multiple moons
jdnicoll@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-08 17:33:32 
Re: Just to be sure: Planet with multiple moons
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-08 18:13:42 
Re: Just to be sure: Planet with multiple moons
Eivind <eivindorama@[E  2008-05-09 09:22:56 
Re: Just to be sure: Planet with multiple moons
Dave Farrance <DaveFar  2008-05-09 08:54:36 
Re: Just to be sure: Planet with multiple moons
Erik Max Francis <max@  2008-05-09 02:46:27 
Re: Just to be sure: Planet with multiple moons
Dr J R Stockton <jrs@[  2008-05-08 19:19:27 
Re: Just to be sure: Planet with multiple moons
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-08 23:51:35 
Re: Just to be sure: Planet with multiple moons
Mike Williams <nospam@  2008-05-09 03:46:47 
Re: Just to be sure: Planet with multiple moons
"A.G.McDowell"   2008-05-09 05:50:10 
Re: Just to be sure: Planet with multiple moons
Dr J R Stockton <jrs@[  2008-05-09 21:15:16 
Re: Just to be sure: Planet with multiple moons
Michael Ash <mike@[EMA  2008-05-09 20:35:50 
Re: Just to be sure: Planet with multiple moons
"nuny@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-09 16:50:10 
Re: Just to be sure: Planet with multiple moons
Phillip Thorne <pethor  2008-05-09 23:08:30 
Re: Just to be sure: Planet with multiple moons
stanleyh@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-09 23:07:02 
Re: Just to be sure: Planet with multiple moons
Eivind <eivindorama@[E  2008-05-15 10:15:08 
Re: Just to be sure: Planet with multiple moons
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-09 23:58:26 
Re: Just to be sure: Planet with multiple moons
Mike Williams <nospam@  2008-05-10 04:32:54 
Re: Just to be sure: Planet with multiple moons
Michael Ash <mike@[EMA  2008-05-10 00:50:09 
Re: Just to be sure: Planet with multiple moons
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 06:23:31 
Re: Just to be sure: Planet with multiple moons
George W Harris <gharr  2008-05-10 04:47:14 
Re: Just to be sure: Planet with multiple moons
Peter Knutsen <peter@[  2008-05-15 15:57:27 
Re: Just to be sure: Planet with multiple moons
George W Harris <gharr  2008-05-15 21:30:00 
Re: Just to be sure: Planet with multiple moons
Erik Max Francis <max@  2008-05-15 19:46:37 
Re: Just to be sure: Planet with multiple moons
Raghar <RagharA2@[EMAI  2008-05-11 08:13:36 
Re: Just to be sure: Planet with multiple moons
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 19:34:28 
Re: Just to be sure: Planet with multiple moons
"alanmc95210@[EMAIL   2008-05-13 17:02:15 
Re: Just to be sure: Planet with multiple moons
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-16 05:13:11 
Re: Just to be sure: Planet with multiple moons
Erik Max Francis <max@  2008-05-16 02:20:20 
Re: Just to be sure: Planet with multiple moons
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-16 17:48:56 
Re: Just to be sure: Planet with multiple moons
Erik Max Francis <max@  2008-05-17 22:08:41 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Dec 4 16:14:01 CST 2008.