"Tom Sr." wrote:
>
> On Jan 31, 7:09 am, b...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B1ackwater) wrote:
> > Oh, and why are most sci-fi space****ps needle-shaped,
> > kind of like stretched-out Concorde jetliners or big
> > TV towers covered with pods ?
>
> You mean, like our *real* space****ps are now?
>
> Because they travel through atmosphere as well as in space. Thus the
> early SF films and television into 50s and 60s were given shapes to
> allow them to travel through both.
>
> The idea of a vessel that travel ONLY in space did not start making it
> into films until the late 1960s. The original STAR TREK and 2001: A
> SPACE ODYSSEY both had ****ps that showed examples of this concept.
>
Our real satellites don't look like the Concorde.
> > That's the WORST possible
> > shape for a spacecraft. They should all look like
> > 'death stars', round balls, instead. Solves all kinds
> > of torque, vibration and differential acceleration
> > problems.
>
> You never watched BABLYON 5, did you?
>
I saw the series on DVD.
--
"In August Rudyard's listlessness called for another series of major and
very unpleasant medical examinations.... He later joked ... 'If this is
what Oscar Wilde went to prison for, he ought to have got the Victoria
Cross.'", Andrew Lycett, "Rudyard Kipling"
|
