Re: SGA--I've abandoned mah boy! ("Outcast" spoilers)

"Anim8rFSK" <ANIM8Rfsk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:ANIM8Rfsk-D4F65D.22170203022008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <q82dnW3GaYahADvanZ2dnUVZ_j2dnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> "Ken from Chicago" <kwicker1b_nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>
>> "Martin" <nonhere@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:aIid****xU9zyqDvanZ2dnUVZ8qOknZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> > "V a p o l l u a n" <onethirtyseven@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in 
>> > message
>> > news:fo548i$spq$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> "jewahe" <j.hanvey@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> >> news:5ZCdnZZteebqjjvanZ2dnUVZ_qednZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>> Martin wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Haven't we just had enough of human form replicators though? I
have.
>> >>>
>> >>> The replicators were overdone in SG1. They got tiresome about the 
>> >>> time
>> >>> that Repli-Carter was introduced. SGA has (as usual) just made them

>> >>> that
>> >>> much more irritating.
>> >>>
>> >>> It's time for all these writers and creative staff to be fired.
There
>> >>> really needs to be an infusion of innovation into the series - they

>> >>> are
>> >>> too stuck on the same plots and enemies.
>> >>>
>> >>> -- 
>> >>> JWH
>> >>
>> >> Need to meet the Furlings :-)
>> >
>> > Yes, they are the missing race. I personally preferred it when the
>> > "Ancients" were just history, there was a bit of mystery to them. 
>> > Probably
>> > the same with the Asgard. The writers had to get rid of them (rather 
>> > badly
>> > done in my view) as they would always be a potential plot spoiler.
>> >
>> > Would have been nice to see a bit more of the Nox (that bird that 
>> > Daniel
>> > fancied was hot) as well.
>> >
>> > The ealr yseries of SG1 gave them so many op****tunities, in Atlantis
>> > they've really messed it up I think. Kill off the Replicator stories 
>> > and
>> > kill off the Wraith (or at least cut them back in the shows) and 
>> > perhaps
>> > bring a little mystery into the show. Perhaps the Pegaus galaxy has 
>> > some
>> > back history as well they could exploit. Problem is they've dropped
no
>> > hints yet.
>>
>> IOW SG2. But if that's the direction they're going, why cancel SG1? The
>> problem still is that the underlying or overarcing reason for the show
is
>> ... un- or ill-defined, other than SG1 was profitable so let's make
more.
>> Making a spin-off isn't inherently a bad thing. You just need a better
>> setup--and followthru:
>>
>>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.tv.stargate-atlantis/msg/8be6a9f6edadc5e3
>>
>> That said, I like the idea of making Pegasus more mysterious. So far,
>> they've travelled millions of light-ye-er, thousands of light-years
>
> You were right the first time.  Millions of light years, minimum.

It was a reference to the most (intentionally) humorous Trek film.

Plus, while I was thinking of the closest galaxy to us (other than our
own), 
it's right both ways.

-- Mathematical Ken from Chicago (0 millions of light-years from Earth)