In article <050220081649090083%takebackamerica@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Audie Murphy's Ghost <takebackamerica@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In article <cv9hq313rm35m1lels2b45hd84mcvv329r@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Merrick
> Baldelli <mbaldelli@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:11:40 -0500, Audie Murphy's Ghost
> > <takebackamerica@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > >Ferrell's too old for Ralph, unless they're retooling this...
> >
> > [Ferrell's] too old... At soon to be 41? You've got to be
> > kidding. Culp was already 51 when "Greatest American Hero" began it's
> > run.
>
> Culp played Bill, not Ralph. I'd agree that Ferrell is not too old for
> Bill. Lessee ... William Katt was 30 (and looked younger) when the
> show started. As you say, Culp was 51. Will Ferrell turns 41 in July.
> Ferrell splits the difference, but he looks older.
>
>
> > And Hollywood is notorious for re-tooling something they're
> > going to re-do. Did you not see the whole part where I talked about,
> > "wouldn't it be cool to..."? That's a guarantee and a gimme that this
> > sort of thing is going to be re-tooled.
> >
> > >thing... to make Ralph and Bill pretty much the same age. You said
in
> > >another post that you think they'd be casting Bill older than Culp
> > >(Robert, not Steven, right?), but I think they'll go younger.
Ferrell
> > >is right for Bill -- well, not that he's *right*, but you know what I
> > >mean. I'll bet my left garbonzo bean they'll try to get Ferrell.
> >
> > The thing is though Ferrell does a lot of sight gags. I can't
> > see it being back seated to a sup****ting actor role.
>
> You have a point there.
As long as he gets to not be funny and bare his buttocks.
--
Star Trek 08:
No Shat, No Show.
|
