"Pete B" <xxxh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:MPG.221541e9bb2becc298ba51@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <fodijl$eso$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> onethirtyseven@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>> >
>> > Well maybe I can't see positive sides in him, but I like him - and
>> > welcome him aboard. I'm serious about that.
>> >
>>
>> I think he played a believable character when he worked for the NID and
>> felt
>> betrayed by some of their actions, and turning over evidence of their
>> actions to the President.If he shows up in Atlantis with a
courts-martial
>> for the team over Fran, MGM is definitely reading this group <G>
>
> LOL - Somehow I don't think that is what they have in mind :)
>
I am having propagation issues so forgive the double posting please if
the
other shows up(at least I am not seeing some posts)
yeah.But I still think about what would happen should the ACLU and the
civil
rights groups have gotten wind of such a thing.If she is sentient, article
93.
if a machine and military property, their quick decision to use what could
be the greatest piece (lol) of military technology ever developed could
fall
under article 108
http://usmilitary.about.com/od/justicelawlegislation/l/blucmj.htm
Heres what the lawyers say..
http://www.abanet.org/dch/committee.cfm?com=ST207500
(Fair use, education purpose obvious!)
Robots, the Human Brain, and the Law
The Life Sciences Division recently sponsored a discussion of scientific
developments andlegal issues associated with the use of robots in
society.The panel demonstrated that robots are gradually becoming a
reality
that needs to be addressed by all of the social sciences, but most
especially by the law. By Christine M.Grant and Melissa Ince
"Japan's national society of engineers is considered the main advisory
group
to the government concerning both scientific and potential legal issues
arising from the use of robots.However, to date the only legal concern
regarding interactions between robot and humans that has been raised in
japan is that of the physical safety of humans in these interactions.
The panel pointed out that an imaginative legal mind can identify many
legal issues likely to arise in the technology progress.If a robot is
designed, for instance, to be sentient and to make judgements, and the
robot
is injured or intentionally injures others, what are the various rights
and
liabilities of manufacturers, programmers, owners, and the robot itself?"
page 14, Legal Implications of Robotic Research
|
