Re: Is "Terminator" stuck in a "Gilligan's Island"-style dilemma?

On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 15:40:24 -0500, "KalElFan" <kalelfan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

:"George W Harris" <gharrus@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
:news:gannq3t7ubout7jc8al2jgt1mmikrtcib2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The only consistent interpretation of the first movie is of one
:> unaltered timeline.
:
:It was easy for the first movie to preserve that interpretation.  It
:was basically a simple time loop with no need to change anything
:along the way.  At this point, the Terminator story as a whole, or
:the franchise, can no longer be interpreted that way.

	Unfortunately, the first movie can't be interpreted 
any other way, so there is no consistent interpretation of 
the story as a whole (even excluding T3).

-- 
e^(i*pi)+1=0

George W. Harris  For actual email address, replace each 'u' with an 'i'.