In article <bob-20CB88.13205509022008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
bob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> In article <MPG.2217ebff22bbee8298ba60@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> Pete B <xxxh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > In article
<bob-6C4F94.22152108022008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > bob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> > > In article <MPG.22171a3c569c1f1798ba5c@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > > Pete B <xxxh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > In article <fhpnq3tjuk3q0pt0rji8t8h67oqs2igns1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
david@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > says...
> > > > > >Why would this TV series have gone through hoops to reconcile
itself
> > > > > >to Terminator 3 (by skipping ahead),
> > > > >
> > > > > No, they contradicted Terminator 3 (by skipping ahead),
> > > >
> > > > No, they changed the future.
> > >
> > > As far as the TV series is concerned, the events of T3 simply never
> > > occur.
> >
> > Yes, because they changed the future.
>
> The contradiction isn't inherent in the change from T3 to the series,
> but rather is an argument between what the producers of the TV chose to
> do and what the movie producers choose to do, going forward with the
> franchise. At the moment , the TV show is the franchise. We'll have to
> see what happens if there is another movie.
I don't really see a contradiction, we just took a time twist with them
:)
|
