Alan F wrote:
> jayembee wrote:
>> David B <bothecat3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> thelostguy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>
>>>> Can anyone confirm whether this was a season finale or a series
>>>> finale?
>>> No, SciFi Channel hasn't announced if they're cancelling or
>>> renewing it yet.
>>
>> Sci Fi initially ordered two seasons. Of course, that's before
>> it proved itself as a complete ratings loser. If Sci Fi keeps
>> its order for a second season, they're even more bat**** crazy
>> than we thought.
>>
>> -- jayembee
>
> Maybe the producers of Flush Gordon have incredibly compromising
> pictures of the NBC-Universal network executives who decide which shows
> to keep. As good an explanation for this show as any.
>
> I have the last 3 or 4 episodes on the DVR which I have not yet
> watched (with the fast forward button handy), but the show was improving
> after the sheer awfulness of the first few episodes. Up to lousy or
> stupid from awful, but hey it was an improvement. Given that the ratings
> were no longer publicized after the 1st several episodes, there must
> have been terrible. However, if Sci-Fi does not have any replacement
> shows in the wings between the writer's strike, BSG coming to an end,
> fading ratings for Stargate Atlantis and few good prospects in
> development, maybe they will renew Flush just to have something to put
> on Friday nights. Rather see them try something more ambitious and
> better written, but I am not a cable network executive,
>
> Alan
>
As bad as Flash Gordon has been at times and despite it's low budget, it
is still better than those awful made for TV movies the SciFI channel
shows. I'd rather watch a low budget show with an interesting story
than some god awful horror flick.
|
