Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Television > Re: Primeval
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 11 of 11 Topic 9598 of 11085
Post > Topic >>

Re: Primeval

by Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 12, 2008 at 07:39 AM

In article <m9idnU4XxtwF4CzanZ2dnUVZ_ruqnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 "Ken from Chicago" <kwicker1b_nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> "Anim8rFSK" <ANIM8Rfsk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:ANIM8Rfsk-2F7808.22003511022008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > In article <ScadneNaO_pYhyzanZ2dnUVZWhednZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > "Ken from Chicago" <kwicker1b_nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> >> "David Johnston" <david@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >> news:5jr1r3hk9e1mmpqaqnj02d7bk80fl0gfh5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > Holy crap having a CGI dinosaur every episode must be expensive
> >>
> >> CGI has gotten cheaper in a decade since XENA and HERC.
> >>
> >> -- Ken from Chicago
> >
> > Only if you don't care about the results.
> >
> > -- 
> > Star Trek 08:
> >
> > No Shat, No Show.
> 
> The technology only gets better, faster, cheaper.

The technicians don't.

 BATTLESTAR GALACTICA has 
> far better, cheaper, faster fx than STAR WARS, SW: EMPIRE STRIKES BACK, 
> SUPERMAN: THE MOVIE, STAR TREK: THE MOTION PICTURE, ST: THE WRATH OF
KHAN, 
> etc.

Oh, god, not even close.  BSG has never risen above 'adequate for 
television' -- it's not even top end television.  It's better than the 
original BSG.  Or B-movies.  But it's not remotely better than 30 year 
old A movies.  Or Serenity.  Or even Enterpise.
> 
> The REAL problem, Anim, as you well know, is that expectation rises also
as 
> people see cutting-edge movie fx. Cutting edge, expensive, glacially
slow 
> TERMINATOR 2: JUDGEMENT DAY morphing technology back in the early 1990s
is 
> common place today, cheaper, faster, better even for tv or home computer

> animation software. The problem is that audience expectations have
risen.

In general I'd accept that as true, but if you think BSG is better than 
the stuff you named, I'd say yours have fallen.
> 
> So yeah, cutting edge movie fx today is better, but more expensive than
tv 
> fx today which can be better than home computer fx, but that's almost
always 
> going to be the case because you have a budget for one 2-3 hour movie
versus 
> the budget of weekly 10-20something episode season.
> 
> -- Ken from Chicago

-- 
Star Trek 08:

No Shat, No Show.
 




 11 Posts in Topic:
Primeval
David Johnston <david@  2008-02-12 00:55:53 
Re: Primeval
Brian Henderson <Brian  2008-02-12 02:02:22 
Re: Primeval
carol@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-14 15:49:50 
Re: Primeval
Brian Henderson <Brian  2008-02-14 20:38:53 
Re: Primeval
carol@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-15 12:23:33 
Re: Primeval
jayembee <jayembeenosp  2008-02-12 02:20:28 
Re: Primeval
"Patrick McNamara&qu  2008-02-12 12:15:53 
Re: Primeval
"Ken from Chicago&qu  2008-02-11 22:04:21 
Re: Primeval
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[  2008-02-11 22:00:35 
Re: Primeval
"Ken from Chicago&qu  2008-02-12 05:06:00 
Re: Primeval
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[  2008-02-12 07:39:31 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Nov 20 10:52:25 CST 2008.