Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Television > Re: Roy Scheide...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 7 Topic 9601 of 11085
Post > Topic >>

Re: Roy Scheider is dead

by Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 12, 2008 at 07:40 AM

In article <13r211r29hfc16@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 "Steven L." <sdlitvin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> Michael O'Connor wrote:
> 
> > 2010 would have been an utter disaster without him IMO;
> > his narration carried the movie.
> 
> I disagree.
> As a narrator he was OK.
> But I thought he was miscast to play Heywood Floyd.  He just didn't come

> off as this thoughtful scientist.
> That's not his fault.  He shouldn't have been cast for that type of
role.

I sort of agree with you.  At first I thought "he's got WAY too much 
charisma for Floyd" . . . BUT . . . he's the heart of 2010.  Without 
him, there wouldn't be a movie there at all.

-- 
Star Trek 08:

No Shat, No Show.
 




 7 Posts in Topic:
Re: Roy Scheider is dead
"Steven L." <  2008-02-11 21:28:12 
Re: Roy Scheider is dead
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[  2008-02-12 07:40:43 
Re: Roy Scheider is dead
"Steven L." <  2008-02-13 08:36:33 
Re: Roy Scheider is dead
Audie Murphy's Ghost <  2008-02-13 09:47:00 
Re: Roy Scheider is dead
jayembee <jayembeenosp  2008-02-13 19:38:03 
Re: Roy Scheider is dead
pv+usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-13 16:16:58 
Re: Roy Scheider is dead
pv+usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-12 17:01:21 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Nov 20 2:46:33 CST 2008.