Re: SGA--The buddy cop ep ("Midway" spoilers)

"Anim8rFSK" <ANIM8Rfsk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:ANIM8Rfsk-460872.00311317022008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <Xns9A46D2CE5D257kensuhotmailcom@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> Chris Schumacher <kensu__@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> "Ken from Chicago" <kwicker1b_nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>> news:tN-dnVrRtJDS2iranZ2dnUVZ_r2nnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > The episode was pretty character-light, pretty much following the
>> > formula and not too much of a twist in said formula.
>> >
>>
>> I suppose that's true, but it was also the best episode SGA's had in a 
>> very
>> long time...
>>
>>
>>                         -==Kensu==-
>
> Yes.  Come the poll, I'll give it a solid 4, because I enjoyed it,
> although it sure didn't hold up to thinking about it.

Indeed.

Not too much deep thought required, and in fact kinda messes it up if you 
think on it too much. It's comfort food, familiar, easy-going. There was a

reason there was a bazillion of that kind of flick made in the '80s. It
was 
to guy flicks what the romcom was for gal flicks.

> And they lose a full point for breaking Sam's leg last week, saying she
> was gonna be on crutches for weeks or months, and then promptly
> forgetting about it.

To be honest, I had forgotten about the broken leg too.

> Nice to see they still have the Stargate SG1 sets.
>
> Isn't Midway station weightless?

As others have mentioned, last time it was under construction, but we were

still able to POWER of the FULLY-ARMED Death-erm Midway station.

-- Ken from Chicago