Re: "Star Trek - Season 2" on HD DVD has been canceled

In article 
<bob-97625F.22113618022008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 Warchild <bob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> In article <61v4blF20sud0U1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>  Sean O'Hara <seanohara@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
> > In the Year of the Earth Rat, the Great and Powerful FDR declared:
> > > Anim8rFSK wrote:
> > >> In article <47ba303c$0$6133$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > >>  FDR <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >> No absurdity at all.  35mm film is still superior to what HD or 
> > >> Blu-ray can hold, and vastly superior to what SD DVD can hold.
> > > 
> > > Processes have changed and improved over the years with film. If you

> > > think that 1960's film was the be all end all of things I think
you're 
> > > fooling yourself.
> > 
> > Maybe not, but it's still of a higher quality than HD.
> > 
> > What, do you think the only movies released in HD will be 
> > Constantine, and not Gone with the Wind?
> 
> In the context of re-presenting what was originally shown on TV, HD is 
> still a vast improvement.
> 
> As for the HD-DVD season two cancellation, not unexpected.  Soon to be 
> followed with the announcement that Season 1 , 2 and 3 will be released 
> on Blu-Ray.
> 
> And yes, I'm pissed!  If not for the (*&^% Star Trek HD-DVD set, I would

> not have bought HD-DVD!

That's exactly what To****ba was counting on when they bribed Paramount.

-- 
Star Trek 09:

No Shat, No Show.