Re: 4th Season Lost - Eggtown - 5 star poll - SPOILERS AHOY !

In article <Xns9A4E1F5B729BDMNE@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 Magic Negro <magicnegro@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> news:ANIM8Rfsk-BFCC9F.02432524022008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
> 
> > In article <1345361@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >  ddl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Dan Lanciani) wrote:
> > 
> >> In article <pqqdnaPWfdImc13anZ2dnUVZ_uCinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, 
> >> sbryce@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Scott Bryce) writes:
> >> 
> >> | If they are taken to another island near the crash site, and
> >> | somebody else "finds" them, then all that needs to be explained is
> >> | why it took so long to find them.
> >> 
> >> I think this would make a great cover story except that it would
> >> require the existence of yet another reasonably hospitable island
> >> (this time presumably actually uninhabited) that is not frequently
> >> visited or otherwise monitored.  Are there any such islands left in
> >> the area?  If so, can I build a house there? :)
> >> 
> >>                     Dan Lanciani
> >>                     ddl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > Yeah, we need an island within swimming distance of the fake crash
> > site that the teams that found the wreckage didn't bother to check.
> > 
> 
> Assuming the cover story has them swimming and not on one of the many 
> rafts that aircraft carry. In which case, a crash at sea, a good wind, 
> could drift them to a further location not within sight or reasonable 
> landfall from the "crashed" aircraft.

Still not within a reasonable search area.  It's not like they could 
have been on a raft for weeks or months.

-- 
Star Trek 09:

No Shat, No Show.