Re: LOST: Have the Producers Lied To Us?

thinbluemime wrote:
> On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 23:32:51 -0500, Steven L. <sdlitvin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> wrote:
> 
>> In January 2005, Damon Lindelof discussed "Lost" in an interview:
>>
>> "We're still trying to be ... firmly ensconced in the world of science 
>> fact.  I don't think we've shown anything on the show yet ... that has 
>> no rational explanation in the real world that we all function within. 
>> We certainly hint at psychic phenomena, happenstance and ... things 
>> being in a place where they probably shouldn't be. But nothing is 
>> flat-out impossible. There are no space****ps. There isn't any time 
>> travel."
>>
>> http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire/handheld/30246.html
>>
>> Well, didn't this new episode, "The Constant," involve at least a 
>> teensy-weensy little bit of time travel???
>>
>> And BTW, do you think that Lindelof's definition of "science fact" 
>> might just be a trifle elastic, to cover all the phenomena we've seen 
>> on the show?
>>
>>
>>
> Duh!
> 
> Do a google group search of my posts for the last 8-12 months and see 
> how many contain the phrase, "They lie...they have to"
> 
> Of course they have lied. They have lied on several levels and for 
> several reasons.
> 
> Read where they lied about the Roger Workman Blueprint. If Lost fans 
> would investigate just that one issue of Lost, they would know where the

> metaphoric Lost island is located.
> 
> Duh!
> 
> BTW, I define a lie as any information that is propagated to knowingly 
> mislead from the truth.
> 
> 
> 

Is it a lie if they change their mind?