Re: LOST: Have the Producers Lied To Us?

Dimensional Traveler wrote:

> Anybody wrote:
> 
>>In article <13skbflnb7tjhde@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, "Steven L."
>><sdlitvin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>In January 2005, Damon Lindelof discussed "Lost" in an interview:
>>>
>>>"We're still trying to be ... firmly ensconced in the world of
>>>science fact.  I don't think we've shown anything on the show yet
>>>... that has
>>>no rational explanation in the real world that we all function
>>>within.
>>>We certainly hint at psychic phenomena, happenstance and ... things
>>>being in a place where they probably shouldn't be. But nothing is
>>>flat-out impossible. There are no space****ps. There isn't any time
>>>travel."
>>>
>>>http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire/handheld/30246.html
>>>
>>>Well, didn't this new episode, "The Constant," involve at least a
>>>teensy-weensy little bit of time travel???
>>>
>>>And BTW, do you think that Lindelof's definition of "science fact"
>>>might just be a trifle elastic, to cover all the phenomena we've
>>>seen on the show?
>>
>>I don't really believe they ever had a long-term plan for the show, or
>>whatever plan they did have is long since history. They are now just
>>making it up as they go along.
> 
> 
> Its been obvious to some of us for two years that they've been making it
up 
> as they go along.
> 
There's nothing worse than a smug dolt.