On Mar 3, 1:59 am, "Dimensional Traveler" <dtra...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Victor Velazquez wrote:
> > Andrew wrote:
> >> On 2008-03-02 08:47:06 +0000, "Dimensional Traveler"
> >> <dtra...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:
> >>> Anybody wrote:
> >>>> In article <13skbflnb7tj...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, "Steven L."
> >>>> <sdlit...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >>>>> In January 2005, Damon Lindelof discussed "Lost" in an interview:
>
> >>>>> "We're still trying to be ... firmly ensconced in the world of
> >>>>> science fact. I don't think we've shown anything on the show yet
> >>>>> ... that has
> >>>>> no rational explanation in the real world that we all function
> >>>>> within.
> >>>>> We certainly hint at psychic phenomena, happenstance and ...
> >>>>> things being in a place where they probably shouldn't be. But
> >>>>> nothing is flat-out impossible. There are no space****ps. There
> >>>>> isn't any time travel."
>
> >>>>>http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire/handheld/30246.html
>
> >>>>> Well, didn't this new episode, "The Constant," involve at least a
> >>>>> teensy-weensy little bit of time travel???
>
> >>>>> And BTW, do you think that Lindelof's definition of "science fact"
> >>>>> might just be a trifle elastic, to cover all the phenomena we've
> >>>>> seen on the show?
>
> >>>> I don't really believe they ever had a long-term plan for the show,
> >>>> or whatever plan they did have is long since history. They are now
> >>>> just making it up as they go along.
>
> >>> Its been obvious to some of us for two years that they've been
> >>> making it up as they go along.
>
> >> Isn't that what creators of fiction do? Or am I just being
> >> simplistic?
>
> > Of course it is. Sure, they often have an outline with plot points
> > A, D, and G but they still have to come up with B,C,E, and F as they
> > write the story. And often when they get to, say, E, they change
> > their minds about what G will be.
>
> > It ain't rocket science. :-)
>
> Although they apparently have tossed that in to the mix as well. :P
>
> No, my complaint is that they started with A, went thru B, C and D,
> introduced E, made up an F that invalidates A, G came flying in from
left
> field, H poked its nose in, ran and hid in the corner, I snuck in and
> assassinated C, D and G, then J tried to act like B and F were its best
> buddies while they were going "who the bleep are you?", K, L and M tried
to
> start a whole new show, and so on. There's making up the story as you
tell
> it and then there's pulling multi-colored fecal matter out of your
> posterior.
Which is basically what you did in this post. I.E., say a bunch of
**** that didn't happen in LOST, attach a bunch of letters to it, and
act like it is the super-convoluted plot of LOST.
|
