Re: LOST: Have the Producers Lied To Us?

"Robert" <rmiller@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> a écrit dans le message de news: 
6d0829cf-1404-4d00-9fd1-0afa7d8539c9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I interpret that statement as saying that they kept things in season 1
> pretty ambiguous as to whether there was a fantastical explanation for
> anything.  The Walt stuff could be coincidence.  Richard Malkin didn't
> necessarily know the future.
>
> And, to be fair, I don't think the time travel aspect existed until it
> was decided to bring Desmond back for the third season.  That decision
> took place about 1 1/2 years after the interview.  During the
> interview Desmond was probably "the guy in the hatch" in the
> producers' minds, if that.
>


Is there evidence of that ? Being "the guy in the hatch", it seems to me
he 
was considered a very im****tant character from the begining, since the 
discovery and opening of the hatch was the big event of season 1. I can 
hardly imagine they didn't know what role he would play later (even if
it's 
possible that they hadn't yet figured out the time travel stuff).