Re: CW renews six series

sef@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Sean Eric Fagan) wrote:

> jayembee  <jayembeenospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> What makes you think it wasn't a "duh" renewal?
> 
> Because the ratings barely justify the expense it costs CW to air
> them. This has been made clear in many, many articles about the show.

And yet, as I said before, they're not going to have anything that
will do any better in that timeslot.

>>> Also, it's worthwhile noting that these aren't full-season
>>> renewals -- just an upfront order for 9 episodes to begin with.
>>Where did you hear that? There are some shows on other networks
>>that are getting only 13-ep pickups for the fall, but those are
>>freshman shows from this season.
> 
> One of the first articles news.google.com found for me when I
> searched for "supernatural renewed" when I posted my article.

That's funny. I just did that, and not only can I not find any
article that says that the orders are for only 9 episodes, one
article:

http://www.eonline.com/news/article/index.jsp?uuid=9bffd8af-a7cc-41e5-
8477-c496ec594bb7

starts out with (emphasis added) "The net announced early
*full-season* pickups for six of its star series Monday..."

-- jayembee