Re: Thoughts on how the Terminator TV series will end?

Pete B wrote:
> In article <kHyAj.2045$er2.889@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, pgalimatias@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
> says...
>> In article <ANIM8Rfsk-447663.16221407032008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, 
>> ANIM8Rfsk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 says...
>>> In article <c1gAj.26$Qy3.6@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>> pgalimatias@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Pelerin Galimatias) wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <fqplu2$eqa$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Obveeus@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>
>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>> I'm doing my very best to ignore T3; bad, bad movie. I didn't like
T2
>>>>>> all that much either, but I liked the evil Terminator a lot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The first movie was terrific, scary and suspenseful with an
appropriate
>>>>>> ending (till Ah'nold was elected governor).
>>>>> And the first movie guaranteed that Judgment Day would happen.  Call
it 
>>>>> 'fate' or call it a closed time loop.  Either way, judgment day is
not 
>>>>> avoidable. 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I thought that the 2nd movie closed out Judgment Day.
>>> No.  The original ending did, but the last minute slapped on using 
>>> footage from earlier in the film with a dumb voice over ending that
went 
>>> out with the theatrical release left it open.
>>>
>> I don't recall the dumb voice over.  I remember the good terminator
>> lowering itself into the molten iron and John crying.  That should have
>> destroyed the last of the future technology.
> 
> No because they forgot something (though I can't remember what)
> 

The hand that the terminator lost.  Hence the second movie.