On 15 Mar 2008 04:08:43 GMT, ddl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Dan Lanciani) wrote:
>In article <JxqqKF.Jz8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, sef@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Sean Eric Fagan)
writes:
>| In article <1346944@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Dan Lanciani
<ddl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>| >There is no reason to believe that
>| >moving to Locke's camp reduces the chance of leaving the island.
>|
>| Only if you haven't been paying as much attention as she has.
>
>It's impossible to share Julitte's (I assume that's who you mean by
"she")
>perspective because (a) she reveals little of what she has observed, (b)
>what she does reveal almost always turns out to be at least in part a
>lie, and (c) her flashbacks are so incongruous that any mildly plausible
>explanation (e.g., she was a spy for yet another rival faction all along)
>is going to seriously distort the meaning of the (supposedly) direct
evidence.
>
>On the other hand, I've observed enough of Juliette's own behavior to
>assign a negative weight to any suggestion she might make. It's clear
>that she isn't actually concerned for Sun's life since she hasn't
mentioned
>the simple solution of an abortion (or at least explained why it wouldn't
>work).
An abortion won't work because the show is being made for an American
audience, and if any problem is solved by means of abortion, the ratings
will drop by about 50%.
--
*John Schilling * "Anything worth doing, *
*Member:AIAA,NRA,ACLU,SAS,LP * is worth doing for money" *
*Chief Scientist & General Partner * -13th Rule of Acquisition *
*White Elephant Research, LLC * "There is no substitute *
*John.Schillin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* for success" *
*661-718-0955 or 661-275-6795 * -58th Rule of Acquisition *
|
