Re: How dangerous of you Doctor

On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 09:51:53 -0400, 
   	   Monsieur Tabernac <mtabernac@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 13:50:08 +0000 (UTC), doctor@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (The Doctor) wrote:
>
>>In article <slrnftssuf.1rs.andyl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>Andy Leighton  <andyl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 12:59:58 +0000 (UTC), 
>>>   	       	    The Doctor <doctor@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It is a reference to driving while under the influence
>>>> under mind altering drugs. IIRC Lennon does admit to that.
>>>
>>>Really?  You do have a reference to Lennon saying that the song is
about
>>>driving under the influence of mind-altering drugs, don't you? Or is it

>>>just yet another thing that you assert as fact but when challenged 
>>>doesn't stand up.
>>>
>>
>>Careto read his last ever interview?
>
> Why do you feel the need to make up so much bull****?
>
> Now all somebody has to do is look up the last interview and note that
> "A Day in the Life" was never mentioned.  

Which it isn't.  Neither is drugs.  At least in the published interview
in Rolling Stone.

> You, of course, will counter with something like "I was referring to his

> last UNPUBLISHED interview."

The interview with Jonathan Cott (of Rolling Stone) was just 3 days
before he was shot.  Not much time for more interviews - especially as
Yoko had strange ideas about horoscopes and you had to be the right
star sign.

The last one published (but not the last interview) was the Playboy
interview.  This does mention "A Day In The Life", it also mentions
drugs, but in completely unconnected paragraphs.

-- 
Andy Leighton => andyl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The Lord is my shepherd, but we still lost the sheep dog trials" 
   - Robert Rankin, _They Came And Ate Us_