On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 00:52:58 -0400, Richard Evans
<infodex@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>Lucifer Sam <invalid@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 19:43:35 -0400, Richard Evans
>><infodex@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>Lucifer Sam <invalid@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 16:32:50 -0400, Richard Evans
>>>><infodex@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Lucifer Sam <invalid@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Bets on it being anything more than a cosmetic surface feature?
>>>>>
>>>>>It would probably have to be good enough to fool a doctor for a
school
>>>>>physical or phys ed classmates in the showers.
>>>>
>>>>Would Skynet really think of building Terminators capable of passing
>>>>such close scrutiny?
>>>
>>>This one they would. She has to pass as a teenager without attracting
>>>suspicion. Refusing to shower or take a physical isn't going to keep
>>>her off the radar.
>>
>>The point I'm trying to make is that Skynet would have little reason
>>to send a Terminator back to go long-term undercover at a high school
>>(or long-term undercover anywhere). They arrive, they go in, they
>>carry out their orders, they leave. No reason that anyone would pay
>>close attention to the genitals.
>>
>>It was the humans that decided to use her for another purpose - one
>>she was probably not designed for.
>>
>>>> For its purposes, the Terminators just need to
>>>>fool humans long enough to get close enough to assassinate them - not
>>>>pass a gynecological exam or have *** with humans.
>>>
>>>Again, not this one.
>>>
>>>>I doubt that the future humans would be capable of modifying a
>>>>reprogrammed Term to such an extent either.
>>>
>>>True, but that's another matter.
>>
>>Correct me if I've missed something here
>
>One of us is missing something.
>
>> - but The Caminator is just
>>another enemy cyborg captured by the resistance and reprogrammed to
>>serve them, right? A different/newer model to the Arnolds - but still
>>your typical 'pretend to be human long enough to get close enough to
>>kill' killing machine.
>
>The original question was whether or not it had genitalia, For this
>terminator, on this assignment, it would almost certainly have to, for
>reasons I've already stated. Regardless of who built it or how it got
>that way. If you want to postulate that it's just captured and
>repurposed metal, then it's not going to fulfill its mission of
>staying undercover, perhaps for years.
Okay - we're probably not going to be able to agree on this.
Wanna move onto discussing what her tits are made of? :)
Skin over shaped metal?
Silicone or similar breast implant-type material?
Cloned breast tissue?
|
