"erilar" <drache@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:drache-7C9C40.13382920032008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <13u3uq7jsc7ql1e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> "George Avalos" <georgeavalos0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> "Honor"
>> 3-17-08 New Amsterdam
>>
>> 5 stars (Ms. Galore)
>>
>> 0-1 stars (Ms. Fountain)
>>
>> -George
>
> 4.3
>
> OK, I do love these flashbacks, as I did in Highlander. I also like the
> way he has grown. In the flashback in this one, his attitude was ahead
> of the time for that period but still subject to it in the way he acted
> at that time.
>
The show is coming along. This was the best yet. I think they're figuring
out what they want now. And they did handle the flashbacks better this
time.
I liked how they set up what was actually a linguistic play on "honor
killing."
It's no Highlander, though.
> And for the people complaining about the "weakness" of the police
> procedural plot segments, I have a question: how do you deal with the sf
> aspects of the CSI shows? Do you consider THEM realistic?
Myself, by finding something else to watch. CSI has less to do with
reality
than a 400 year old man, or killer robots from the future. Problem is,
they
don't know that.
|
