In article <4MBEj.211$Cn4.27@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
"Joetheone" <joetheone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "erilar" <drache@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:drache-7C9C40.13382920032008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > In article <13u3uq7jsc7ql1e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > "George Avalos" <georgeavalos0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> >> "Honor"
> >> 3-17-08 New Amsterdam
> >>
> >> 5 stars (Ms. Galore)
> >>
> >> 0-1 stars (Ms. Fountain)
> >>
> >> -George
> >
> > 4.3
> >
> > OK, I do love these flashbacks, as I did in Highlander. I also like
the
> > way he has grown. In the flashback in this one, his attitude was
ahead
> > of the time for that period but still subject to it in the way he
acted
> > at that time.
> >
> The show is coming along. This was the best yet. I think they're
figuring
> out what they want now. And they did handle the flashbacks better this
time.
> I liked how they set up what was actually a linguistic play on "honor
> killing."
> It's no Highlander, though.
True, but it's the closest thing I've seen to it 8-) And I always
liked the flashbacks better than the fancy lighting for head-chopping 8-)
>
> > And for the people complaining about the "weakness" of the police
> > procedural plot segments, I have a question: how do you deal with the
sf
> > aspects of the CSI shows? Do you consider THEM realistic?
>
> Myself, by finding something else to watch. CSI has less to do with
reality
> than a 400 year old man, or killer robots from the future. Problem is,
they
> don't know that.
Oh, I like sf, so I watch a couple of the CSI shows with that in mind
8-)
--
Mary Loomer Oliver (aka Erilar)
You can't reason with someone whose first line of argument is
that reason doesn't count. --Isaac Asimov
Erilar's Cave Annex: http://www.chibardun.net/~erilarlo
|
