"erilar" <drache@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:drache-C01809.18501420032008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <4MBEj.211$Cn4.27@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> "Joetheone" <joetheone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> "erilar" <drache@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:drache-7C9C40.13382920032008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > In article <13u3uq7jsc7ql1e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> > "George Avalos" <georgeavalos0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Honor"
>> >> 3-17-08 New Amsterdam
>> >>
>> >> 5 stars (Ms. Galore)
>> >>
>> >> 0-1 stars (Ms. Fountain)
>> >>
>> >> -George
>> >
>> > 4.3
>> >
>> > OK, I do love these flashbacks, as I did in Highlander. I also like
>> > the
>> > way he has grown. In the flashback in this one, his attitude was
ahead
>> > of the time for that period but still subject to it in the way he
acted
>> > at that time.
>> >
>> The show is coming along. This was the best yet. I think they're
figuring
>> out what they want now. And they did handle the flashbacks better this
>> time.
>> I liked how they set up what was actually a linguistic play on "honor
>> killing."
>> It's no Highlander, though.
> True, but it's the closest thing I've seen to it 8-) And I always
> liked the flashbacks better than the fancy lighting for head-chopping
8-)
>>
I guess if you've seen on quickening, you've seen them al.
That's true.
>> > And for the people complaining about the "weakness" of the police
>> > procedural plot segments, I have a question: how do you deal with the
>> > sf
>> > aspects of the CSI shows? Do you consider THEM realistic?
>>
>> Myself, by finding something else to watch. CSI has less to do with
>> reality
>> than a 400 year old man, or killer robots from the future. Problem is,
>> they
>> don't know that.
> Oh, I like sf, so I watch a couple of the CSI shows with that in mind
> 8-)
>
A healthy attitude.
|
