Anim8rFSK wrote:
> In article <8c08u3dnmafal9cmsslflotepueau29c78@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> "David V. Loewe, Jr" <daveloewe@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:35:14 -0700, Michael Bowker
>> <mikeb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>> Anim8rFSK wrote:
>>>> 1
>>>>
>>>> I doubt I'll watch it again.
>>>>
>>> 1.5 I missed the first half hour and didn't go back on the recording.
>> You guys are just killing me. You don't seem to be watching the same
>> show that I am. I understand your comments (when you actually include
>> substantive comments), but they still do not add up to a sub-2.0 show.
>>
>> Not up to previous efforts, but still strong. The more we learn about
>> Johann van der Zee (aka John Amsterdam aka John York) the more I like
>> him as a character.
>>
>> 4.0
>
> I didn't have much substansive to say. I was bored out of my mind. I
> started wandering around the room. I find the main character boring and
> useless and I'm actively hoping for his death.
>
I didn't watch the whole show and had no desire to go back and watch
more. I didn't find the mystery compelling and I didn't find the
flashbacks interesting or intriguing. Which is weird because I really
liked the pilot, but it just seems that since then it's been pretty much
a straight down quality plot (and at a pretty steep slope).
|
