shawn wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:22:42 -0700, A Watcher
> <stocksami@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> David wrote:
>>>
http://community.tvguide.com/blog-entry/TVGuide-Editors-Blog/Ausiello-Re****t/Ausiello-Scoop-Sarah/800035889
>>>
>>> « Ausiello Re****t
>>> Scoop! Sarah Connor Bulking Up for Season 2
>>>
>>> It looks like she'll be back.
>>>
>>> I'm hearing that Fox's in-limbo Sarah Connor Chronicles has quietly
>>> begun staffing up for the fall. According to insiders, Fox has given
>>> producers the green light to start booking directors for next
>>> season's first three episodes. While this is no guarantee that SCC
>>> is returning , it's obviously a very good sign.
>>>
>>> A Fox spokesperson, meanwhile, maintains that, "No decision about a
>>> second season has been made yet."
>>
>> It would be really stupid to cancel it with the movie coming out next
>> year. Fox has done lot's of stupid things before, though.
>
> Not really, since most of these business units run as individual
> companies. So the movie might do great business for the movie side of
> the house but none of that revenue will show up in the television side
> of the company. So neither side cares if the other is putting out a
> new product or not since it doesn't show up in their bottom line.
>
> I agree it's a stupid thing from a company standpoint, but it's the
> reality for many studio companies.
Different megacorps do it different ways. But one needs to keep in mind
the
various anti-monopoly/anti-collusion laws in the US.
--
Sig under construction
|
