Re: ABC orders fantasy pilot

Anim8rFSK wrote:
> In article <13uvnfboafn229f@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>  Michael Bowker <mikeb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>> Anim8rFSK wrote:
>>> In article <f9fvu3p1pafsip44jshrfb51tpd8uudncl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>  Brian Thorn <bthorn64@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 20:34:48 -0700 (PDT), "Ian J. Ball"
>>>> <iball@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> "Psych" without the laughs?
>>>>> Maybe. But I've never had any desire to watch "Psych", 
>>>> "Psych" is a lot like "Monk".
>>> Except Psych is usually good, and Monk is usually bad.  :(
>>>
>>>  The so-called mysteries are usually very
>>>> weak. The show lives and dies on the chemistry and interplay between
>>>> its leads. Shalhoub elevates "Monk" far above its mundane
foundations.
>>>> Roday and Hill are just plain fun to watch and do the same for
>>>> "Psych".
>>>>
>>>> Brian
>> Monk was good first season.  But they ran into a trap.  They can't
"fix" 
>> monk without destroying the show and for some of us the static 
>> unchanging "disturbed" Monk is hard to watch (and get's harder and 
>> harder to watch every season).  I dropped out when they just switched 
>> Monk's minder.
> 
> Yes.  Monk used to be good, and has had a pretty much linear decline.
> 
> Just literally saw an NBC ad for Monk and Psych come to NBC next Sunday!
> 
<shudder>

Well I won't be watching.