Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series

"Pete B" <xxxh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:MPG.22635fba1553ed2498bd26@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <ftb86i$c6h$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, hanaram857
> @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 says...
>
>> There are still alot of unexplored avenues with the sort of established
>> history this show has.
>
> Indeed, but this is the way they want to go.
>
> (Of course there is the alien race in "Scorched Earth" - would be
> interesting to learn more about them)
>
>> We havent met the Furlings.
>
> Nor are we likely to, the powers the be seems to think it was a stupid
> name they came up with, that it sounds like "furry" and thusly wont
> return to them (lame yes)
>
> Though Rob Cooper pointed out the amusing coincidence that "Furlings" is
> an anagram of FunGirls *g*
>
>> In any case I would
>> definitely like to see the special effects to be excellent from the
very
>> start, I was disappointed with the suits of armor in the series
compared 
>> to
>> the armor from the movies when the series first came out.Yes, I know,
it 
>> was
>> expensive.
>
> Yeah Brad Wright has said he would like more money to do this series or
> he may not be interested at all. Would be a downer to go to a far away
> galaxy and it looks like a forrest in canada...
>


I guess with a show like this, that was going to "end" so many times, alot

of this stuff was written without regard to longevity?Furlings is a stupid

name.
Did they have in mind the Atlantis spinoff when they did "Lost City"?The 
drones in Lost City are far different from the drones in "Rising", like
they 
had to re-adapt the concept the same way the armor was.