Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Television > Re: The (possib...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 39 of 44 Topic 9919 of 10908
Post > Topic >>

Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series

by "Varekem" <hanaram857@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 7, 2008 at 02:15 AM

"jojo" <jojlolo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:2e5a89aa-45d3-4d53-ab2b-74ca56374235@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Apr 6, 10:27 pm, "Varekem" <hanaram...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Chris Schumacher" <kens...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:Xns9A788D2CCF1Bkensuhotmailcom@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Pete B <xxxh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:MPG.2262465d343ca77198bd19
> > @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> It's a first pitch, subject to all kinds of network interference
before
> >> it reaches the screens - IF it reaches them.
>
> > Well, of course it isn't finalized. I mean, there's no one the crew 
> > meets
> > in the first
> > episode, pisses off, and ends up fighting for five or so years. :)
>
> > -==Kensu==-
> > "Screw you guys, I'm going home." -Jack O'Neil: Stargate Universe
> > ("Pilot")
>
> There are still alot of unexplored avenues with the sort of established
> history this show has.We havent met the Furlings.What if they turned out

> to
> "speak" an ancient form of semitic "Babylonian"?The show layed out how
we
> got the Egyptian pantheon.Is it taboo to go for the other bits :-)
> What about a few teams that go meeting other cultures deciding to
pretend
> they are Gods and go down the path of the Guaold?In any case I would
> definitely like to see the special effects to be excellent from the very
> start, I was disappointed with the suits of armor in the series compared

> to
> the armor from the movies when the series first came out.Yes, I know, it

> was
> expensive.

"They never touched the monotheistic religions. Just once when Vala was
pregnant and said something like "have you ever heard of someone being
born without ***ual relations ?" and the others were slightly
embarrassed - and they spoke about Arthur. They chose to never speak
about Christianity, Judaism, or Islam for obvious reasons (it could
make a lot of people angry) , but Galactica does it (indirectly) and
with great success. So why not ? They don't even have to invent
anything, they can just behave as usual and steal from other writers
ideas."

A story involving the origins of Babylonian symbolism could be viable and 
would actually be along the lines of the original movie.It could be done
but 
you would certainly have people wondering if you were trying to convey a 
particular religious message (or a specifically non-religious
message-there 
are no chaplains on the show, and all military bases have them).The show 
never addressed beliefs of the ancients in any higher beings than
themselves 
(who have the power of gods almost) but that could be hand-waved away
easily 
with one episode where they say that dont know any more than anyone else 
about the matter.Some sort of explanation , say, for the Tower of Babel (
a 
weapon? A war between space races?) would anchor the show to existing 
mythology but to be honest, I would be happy if they have  good science 
advisors and have a decent technical base for whatever they do. I wont
mind 
missing out on discovering the Planet of the Hebrews, nobody would have
the 
balls to do that well anyway and too many people will cry just reading
this 
post.<G>
 




 44 Posts in Topic:
The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Pete B <xxxh@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-06 03:31:39 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Dan Dassow <dan_dassow  2008-04-05 20:20:38 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Anybody <anybody@[EMAI  2008-04-06 16:47:39 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
"Wouter Valentijn&qu  2008-04-06 16:58:47 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Pete B <xxxh@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-06 18:57:33 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
"bc_gisele" <  2008-04-06 23:55:23 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Tim Bruening <tsbrueni  2008-04-17 00:54:52 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
jojo <jojlolo@[EMAIL P  2008-04-05 22:50:53 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Chris Schumacher <kens  2008-04-06 18:52:37 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Pete B <xxxh@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-06 21:02:47 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
"Varekem" <h  2008-04-06 14:27:09 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
"Wouter Valentijn&qu  2008-04-06 23:02:53 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
"Varekem" <h  2008-04-06 16:09:38 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
"Wouter Valentijn&qu  2008-04-07 20:07:18 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
shawn <nanoflower@[EMA  2008-04-15 14:10:34 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Pete B <xxxh@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-15 20:59:24 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
khaight@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-15 18:24:42 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[  2008-04-15 19:25:42 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Michael Bowker <mikeb@  2008-04-15 21:19:25 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Pete B <xxxh@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-17 00:33:34 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
khaight@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-16 22:31:36 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
CC <Caneher@[EMAIL PRO  2008-07-27 03:07:18 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[  2008-04-15 12:11:09 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Pete B <xxxh@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-06 23:32:00 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
"Varekem" <h  2008-04-06 16:44:29 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Pete B <xxxh@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-07 00:48:21 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
"Varekem" <h  2008-04-06 19:02:18 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Chris Schumacher <kens  2008-04-07 00:47:56 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Pete B <xxxh@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-07 05:52:28 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
jill@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-07 23:06:16 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
"Dimensional Travele  2008-04-07 22:34:47 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
khaight@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 13:11:39 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Richard Todd <rmtodd@[  2008-04-08 13:46:09 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
shawn <nanoflower@[EMA  2008-04-15 14:20:40 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Pete B <xxxh@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-07 05:51:47 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
shawn <nanoflower@[EMA  2008-04-15 14:13:55 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Pete B <xxxh@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-17 00:28:23 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
jojo <jojlolo@[EMAIL P  2008-04-06 22:36:05 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
"Varekem" <h  2008-04-07 02:15:43 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
mike3 <mike4ty4@[EMAIL  2008-05-03 19:18:18 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Anybody <anybody@[EMAI  2008-05-04 14:46:51 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
mike3 <mike4ty4@[EMAIL  2008-05-06 00:06:17 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Anybody <anybody@[EMAI  2008-05-07 09:12:16 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
mike3 <mike4ty4@[EMAIL  2008-05-07 16:32:13 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Oct 16 1:13:47 CDT 2008.