Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Television > Re: The (possib...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 33 of 44 Topic 9919 of 11085
Post > Topic >>

Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series

by Richard Todd <rmtodd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 8, 2008 at 01:46 PM

"Dimensional Traveler" <dtravel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:

> jill wrote:
>> Along these lines, have you ever wondered why they haven't been
>> collecting staff weapons? Think of all the times they have
>> blasted a group of Jaffa and just left the staff weapons laying
>> around.  ARG!

> Didn't they sorta address this in one episode?  I seem to recall one
episode 
> where some Jaffa wanted to know why SGC wasn't helping them train with
staff 
> weapons.  O'Neil and Carter responded by having a Jaffa fire at a
hanging 
> log, punching a crater or hole in the log; then Carter cut the log in
half 
> with her P90.  O'Neil followed up by saying staff weapons were weapons
for 
> terrorizing people while the SGC's weapons were for fighting a war with.

Yeah, that's what O'Neil said then.  I'm not sure I entirely buy it --
seems
to me, the staff weapon could have been a decent weapon of war if the
Jaffa
hadn't all gone to the Imperial Stormtrooper Marksman****p Academy for
their
lessons :-).  Also, one might point out (and, IIRC, one of the Jaffa in
that
episode *did* point out) that the H&K P90, while having a number of fine
characteristics, is dependent on being regularly fed with bullets, and
thus
dependent on at least semi-regular contact with the Department of Defense
and its supply sergeants.  Staff weapons don't need ammo; it's not clear
how
many shots one can get out of its energy source, but I don't think we've
ever seen a staff weapon energy source "run out" unless subjected to 
extreme abuse like, say, being hotwired to a Stargate and used to dial
the Asgard galaxy.
 




 44 Posts in Topic:
The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Pete B <xxxh@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-06 03:31:39 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Dan Dassow <dan_dassow  2008-04-05 20:20:38 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Anybody <anybody@[EMAI  2008-04-06 16:47:39 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
"Wouter Valentijn&qu  2008-04-06 16:58:47 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Pete B <xxxh@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-06 18:57:33 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
"bc_gisele" <  2008-04-06 23:55:23 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Tim Bruening <tsbrueni  2008-04-17 00:54:52 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
jojo <jojlolo@[EMAIL P  2008-04-05 22:50:53 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Chris Schumacher <kens  2008-04-06 18:52:37 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Pete B <xxxh@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-06 21:02:47 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
"Varekem" <h  2008-04-06 14:27:09 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
"Wouter Valentijn&qu  2008-04-06 23:02:53 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
"Varekem" <h  2008-04-06 16:09:38 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
"Wouter Valentijn&qu  2008-04-07 20:07:18 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
shawn <nanoflower@[EMA  2008-04-15 14:10:34 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Pete B <xxxh@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-15 20:59:24 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
khaight@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-15 18:24:42 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[  2008-04-15 19:25:42 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Michael Bowker <mikeb@  2008-04-15 21:19:25 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Pete B <xxxh@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-17 00:33:34 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
khaight@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-16 22:31:36 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
CC <Caneher@[EMAIL PRO  2008-07-27 03:07:18 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[  2008-04-15 12:11:09 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Pete B <xxxh@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-06 23:32:00 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
"Varekem" <h  2008-04-06 16:44:29 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Pete B <xxxh@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-07 00:48:21 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
"Varekem" <h  2008-04-06 19:02:18 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Chris Schumacher <kens  2008-04-07 00:47:56 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Pete B <xxxh@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-07 05:52:28 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
jill@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-07 23:06:16 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
"Dimensional Travele  2008-04-07 22:34:47 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
khaight@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 13:11:39 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Richard Todd <rmtodd@[  2008-04-08 13:46:09 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
shawn <nanoflower@[EMA  2008-04-15 14:20:40 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Pete B <xxxh@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-07 05:51:47 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
shawn <nanoflower@[EMA  2008-04-15 14:13:55 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Pete B <xxxh@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-17 00:28:23 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
jojo <jojlolo@[EMAIL P  2008-04-06 22:36:05 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
"Varekem" <h  2008-04-07 02:15:43 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
mike3 <mike4ty4@[EMAIL  2008-05-03 19:18:18 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Anybody <anybody@[EMAI  2008-05-04 14:46:51 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
mike3 <mike4ty4@[EMAIL  2008-05-06 00:06:17 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
Anybody <anybody@[EMAI  2008-05-07 09:12:16 
Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series
mike3 <mike4ty4@[EMAIL  2008-05-07 16:32:13 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 11:10:42 CST 2008.