Re: The Sarah Jane Adventures (5 Tardis Poll) 5/11

On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 07:24:04 GMT, Brian Henderson
<BrianL.Henderson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>Anim8rFSK wrote:
>> Yes.  That was a fine episode, which is probably why I found TSJA to be

>> such a letdown.  
>
>Sarah Jane is a show made for little kids, not adults.  If you're 
>expecting another Dr. Who out of it, of course you're going to be 
>disappointed, but it's not supposed to be another Dr. Who.

	I was (and still am) more entertained by earlier episodes of
"The Tomorrow People" than this.  Hell, I'm able to watch SpongeBob
without having the adult in me cringing.  This makes me cringe, and
that's not a good sign.  

>
>> Yeah, it's only half an hour, and it's right before the season premiere

>> of Dr. Who, and apparently this episode of Who does NOT have the vile 
>> Tate creature, so it might actually be watchable.
>
>It's not the season premiere, it's the Christmas special, which is 
>really more the end of last series than the beginning of this one. 
>SciFi is just being stupid.

	Great...  Even worse.  They're being shown out of order.

-- 
-=-=-/ )=*=-='=-.-'-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
   _( (_ , '_  *   .               Merrick Baldelli
  (((\ \>  /_1   `                 
  (\\\\ \_/ / 
-=-\       /-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    \    _/  Who are these folks and why have they 
    /   /    stopped taking their medication? 
             - Captain Infinity